Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xath" data-source="post: 2625341" data-attributes="member: 17040"><p><strong>In my opinion...</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This certainly helps. After all, I can't have much experience of who they are or what kind of judge they'd be if I've never heard of them. The nomination blurb helps, but I'd like to see more.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Familiarity yes, agreement no. I tried to vote for people with a wide variety of views. I felt that this way the results of the Ennies would be more applicable to the entire gaming population.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not particularly. More like quality of posts. I read reviews, and they tell me a bit, but you can learn just as much about a person from their posts. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It helps, but it's not everything. Variety of experience is just as importance as variety in gaming preferences. It helps get more well rounded results.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. These positions require a lot of dedication. I give some corrolation to dedication to ENWorld and the ENnies. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. I think all of the previous judges have done a good job. It stands to reason that they would do so again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again for variety. Not required by any means, but nice to have.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not particularly. People can have a high post count without contributing to the community. Others can have under 500 posts, but their posts were all well thought out and meaningful. (Not to imply that this is always the case, but I tend to look at quality as much as quantity).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I read them all. But I don't know how much they influenced my decision.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, definitely. The internet can be very misleading, and people only see as much of you as you want them to see. In person, it's a bit more difficult to hide things. I have met and liked almost all of the people I voted for. (As in I havn't met one, not that I don't like him)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Familiarity with multiple systems is very important. It makes it that much easier to understand and appreciate a new system that may be submitted into the competition. Impartiality is useful, but so is bias. You may be able to judge a mechanic by being impartial, but there's no such thing as an impartial vote on "best art." And as I said above, I'd prefer a variety of bias. Eloquence? Meh. As long as they can get their point across. Don't get me wrong, the ability to express onesself goes a long way, but I only care about eloquence if they have to pull PC's duty of podium host. That's where eloquence matters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xath, post: 2625341, member: 17040"] [b]In my opinion...[/b] This certainly helps. After all, I can't have much experience of who they are or what kind of judge they'd be if I've never heard of them. The nomination blurb helps, but I'd like to see more. Familiarity yes, agreement no. I tried to vote for people with a wide variety of views. I felt that this way the results of the Ennies would be more applicable to the entire gaming population. Not particularly. More like quality of posts. I read reviews, and they tell me a bit, but you can learn just as much about a person from their posts. It helps, but it's not everything. Variety of experience is just as importance as variety in gaming preferences. It helps get more well rounded results. Yes. These positions require a lot of dedication. I give some corrolation to dedication to ENWorld and the ENnies. Yes. I think all of the previous judges have done a good job. It stands to reason that they would do so again. Again for variety. Not required by any means, but nice to have. Not particularly. People can have a high post count without contributing to the community. Others can have under 500 posts, but their posts were all well thought out and meaningful. (Not to imply that this is always the case, but I tend to look at quality as much as quantity). I read them all. But I don't know how much they influenced my decision. Yes, definitely. The internet can be very misleading, and people only see as much of you as you want them to see. In person, it's a bit more difficult to hide things. I have met and liked almost all of the people I voted for. (As in I havn't met one, not that I don't like him) Familiarity with multiple systems is very important. It makes it that much easier to understand and appreciate a new system that may be submitted into the competition. Impartiality is useful, but so is bias. You may be able to judge a mechanic by being impartial, but there's no such thing as an impartial vote on "best art." And as I said above, I'd prefer a variety of bias. Eloquence? Meh. As long as they can get their point across. Don't get me wrong, the ability to express onesself goes a long way, but I only care about eloquence if they have to pull PC's duty of podium host. That's where eloquence matters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
Top