Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nakia" data-source="post: 2627471" data-attributes="member: 25747"><p>Re: "New blood" and the Umbran/TB discussion:</p><p>There's discussion about what "we" want and need from judges and the election process, but it seems to me there are different "we's", each of which has different interests which impact the discussion. If we mean "we" in the broadest sense -- every member/potential voter – then the open nomination and “one person, one vote” mechanism we have in place seems the best. It’s the only way to assure everyone the opportunity to have his or her voice heard.</p><p></p><p>Part of the problem (if I’m understanding Umbran correctly), is that the “we” seems to be limited to a rather small percentage of the ENWorld population. Not everyone votes. How to expand that “we” lies at the heart of the issue. Will changing the categories/nomination procedures expand that “we”? Honestly, I have no idea. I don’t think anyone could know unless it was tried. The “we” of voter participation is balanced by the “we” of potential judges. Changing the nomination process/holding slots for “new blood” would limit that pool. I would want to keep both “wes” as broad as possible</p><p></p><p>There’s another “we”; the ENWorld “powers that be” – Dextra, Morrus, and the others who have taken it upon themselves to look out for ENWorld in a manner more encompassing than the average user. They have interests as well. I would imagine those include making the Ennies as fair, popular, and meaningful as possible, so that they become more recognized and known in the industry and the gaming community. If the “powers that be” feel the site and the awards best interests are better served by changing the nominations and/or voting process (because “new blood” draws more voters and thus, more involvement and popularity), then I think they are within their rights to do so.</p><p></p><p>I’ll also echo the sentiment that it would be helpful to keep the results hidden. Percentages haven’t changed significantly since Sunday; it seems decided already. Keeping the results hidden would at least help the “my vote does not matter because it’s already finished” attitude.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's my .02.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nakia, post: 2627471, member: 25747"] Re: "New blood" and the Umbran/TB discussion: There's discussion about what "we" want and need from judges and the election process, but it seems to me there are different "we's", each of which has different interests which impact the discussion. If we mean "we" in the broadest sense -- every member/potential voter – then the open nomination and “one person, one vote” mechanism we have in place seems the best. It’s the only way to assure everyone the opportunity to have his or her voice heard. Part of the problem (if I’m understanding Umbran correctly), is that the “we” seems to be limited to a rather small percentage of the ENWorld population. Not everyone votes. How to expand that “we” lies at the heart of the issue. Will changing the categories/nomination procedures expand that “we”? Honestly, I have no idea. I don’t think anyone could know unless it was tried. The “we” of voter participation is balanced by the “we” of potential judges. Changing the nomination process/holding slots for “new blood” would limit that pool. I would want to keep both “wes” as broad as possible There’s another “we”; the ENWorld “powers that be” – Dextra, Morrus, and the others who have taken it upon themselves to look out for ENWorld in a manner more encompassing than the average user. They have interests as well. I would imagine those include making the Ennies as fair, popular, and meaningful as possible, so that they become more recognized and known in the industry and the gaming community. If the “powers that be” feel the site and the awards best interests are better served by changing the nominations and/or voting process (because “new blood” draws more voters and thus, more involvement and popularity), then I think they are within their rights to do so. I’ll also echo the sentiment that it would be helpful to keep the results hidden. Percentages haven’t changed significantly since Sunday; it seems decided already. Keeping the results hidden would at least help the “my vote does not matter because it’s already finished” attitude. Anyway, that's my .02. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
Top