Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dextra" data-source="post: 2630101" data-attributes="member: 5705"><p>I think that there are other reasons other than a potential increase in voter turnout for making sure that we have at least once new judge every year. My main concern is publisher participation. </p><p></p><p>If year after year a publisher submitted products never to be nominated by the same set of judges, they would probably (or may already have) decide to not bother sending in product in the future, since the current set of judges is not impressed by their stuff, etc. </p><p></p><p>In the grand scale of things, the number of ENWorlders who choose to vote for a judge (well, within reason- so long as we maintain around 500 voters I think we can claim quorum) is less important to me than the number of publishers who choose to enter product. </p><p></p><p>It is definitely important to encourage increased voter turnout, especially from those who in the past may have questioned some of the judges' choices. I suspect that opening up the voting to everyone and not just EN World members via a voting booth on the ENnies site might help- that way all gamers, not those who haunt ENW could feel more a part of the process. The increased tension of the secret ballot could also be an enticement. I also want to figure out a mechanic by which at least one new judge would be selected every year. Perhaps this could be accomplished by having three categories:</p><p>1. Incumbents: 3 positions.</p><p>2. n00b: 1 position</p><p>3. Wild Car: 1 position: can be a n00b, can be someone with judge experience</p><p>BUT, this assumes that in the future that current voter trends will hold true. </p><p></p><p>BTW, I'm also interested to hear what you have to say about voting systems. If we've got a field of candidates of 15-25 peeps and we only want to choose five, how do we pull it off? Would the same system we have in place for the product selection work? If so, should we limit each person to how many judges they can choose (say, 7?), or does that mess with the system?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dextra, post: 2630101, member: 5705"] I think that there are other reasons other than a potential increase in voter turnout for making sure that we have at least once new judge every year. My main concern is publisher participation. If year after year a publisher submitted products never to be nominated by the same set of judges, they would probably (or may already have) decide to not bother sending in product in the future, since the current set of judges is not impressed by their stuff, etc. In the grand scale of things, the number of ENWorlders who choose to vote for a judge (well, within reason- so long as we maintain around 500 voters I think we can claim quorum) is less important to me than the number of publishers who choose to enter product. It is definitely important to encourage increased voter turnout, especially from those who in the past may have questioned some of the judges' choices. I suspect that opening up the voting to everyone and not just EN World members via a voting booth on the ENnies site might help- that way all gamers, not those who haunt ENW could feel more a part of the process. The increased tension of the secret ballot could also be an enticement. I also want to figure out a mechanic by which at least one new judge would be selected every year. Perhaps this could be accomplished by having three categories: 1. Incumbents: 3 positions. 2. n00b: 1 position 3. Wild Car: 1 position: can be a n00b, can be someone with judge experience BUT, this assumes that in the future that current voter trends will hold true. BTW, I'm also interested to hear what you have to say about voting systems. If we've got a field of candidates of 15-25 peeps and we only want to choose five, how do we pull it off? Would the same system we have in place for the product selection work? If so, should we limit each person to how many judges they can choose (say, 7?), or does that mess with the system? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
2006 ENnies Judge Voting Poll/Thread
Top