Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 8180250" data-attributes="member: 42856">Actually no. The point is not to flee but to deprive attackers of the advantage of surprise. There is absolutely no reason to stick around when in tactical disadvantage. None of the contingencies were mentioning the sorcerer (of which they haven't heard about so far), they are just realistic contingencies wizards intending on surviving could take. A mere sorcerer won't be able to change its spell loadout for the task at hand because he is stuck with instinctive magic, lacking the breadth of power of the wizards, but when you can actually change what you'll be casting from day to day, you specialize and you don't get stupidly caught flat-footed. A minimum of the spell allotment should be devoted to escaping (to be able to function appropriately for the task at hand) because that's enough to plan correctly for the next day. So, have you been able to catch the four bumbling, underoptimized wizards above, using the build you claimed and with of course adhering to the D&D rules? Or did they escape?Said the eldest Curiatius brother.</blockquote>