• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D 3E/3.5 [3.0 vs. 3.5] Old or New Wounding?

Which? 3.0 Wounding or 3.5 Wounding?

  • [3.0] Bring back the hit point sapping. It was so fun seeing them bleed to death.

    Votes: 8 25.0%
  • [3.5] Constitution damage rocks. There's nothing like seeing a seeing an ogre being stabbed into a s

    Votes: 19 59.4%
  • [3.0/3.5] I don't really care. Both are okay, or I don't use any of them.

    Votes: 5 15.6%


log in or register to remove this ad

Derulbaskul

Adventurer
Make 'em bleed.

I'm for the 3.0 version and this is one of my very few house rules. Con damage belongs to the marrowcrushing weapon property from BoVD.

Cheers
D
 

the Jester

Legend
The new wounding is much more consistent with blood loss in 3rd edition (3.0 or 3.5). After all, blood drain is con damage; so it's only logical.

Better still, the old Wounding was a nightmare of bookkeeping. OK, on my turn I have to remember to deal 2 hp to Zonzor, 1 to Thimbleton and 4 to Thrush... bah! Con damage works for me.
 

Remove ads

Top