[3.5] Clearly it is

Mark

CreativeMountainGames.com
When taking into consideration the balance issues inherent in the design process as role-playing games, and D&D in particular is and was developed one has to wonder in comparison to mechanics and stat blocks. With everyone in the know there needs to be more or less the same rationale of thought and that goes without saying. Many agree or think otherwise. Much of the debate on sides that are ill-defined or inconceivable to not only the average player but generally the en masse flexibility of both the in-crowd and other parts of several independently.

I'm not in a position with all of the hubbub and inuendo that is often the case in situations where circumstances are vague or fuzzy without proper definitions and clear delineation. So several of the topics, vis-a-vis the broken Ranger, the spells such as harm, resurection, the various summon effects and their ilk, and a number of the magical items that most people have mentioned in passing or in particular. With all of the discussion being bandied about and put forth as either rumor or in the brief snippets of information being either leaked through official channels or perhaps teased to the public to gain a forthcoming of thought among those who may or may not be interested in the future of the hobby as it stands to date.

Shazizzle?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Mark, my brain hurts. There is something hypnotic about what you just wrote... obviously a snippet from the Book of Vile Darkness.

Cheers!
 




LOL

:D

Mark, you managed to say so little so well in two whole paragraphs of it!

And it most CERTAINLY summed up exactly the situation of the 3.5e release and information status.
 

HellHound said:
LOL

:D

Mark, you managed to say so little so well in two whole paragraphs of it!

And it most CERTAINLY summed up exactly the situation of the 3.5e release and information status.

Yup, What he said
 



Remove ads

Top