Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
[3.5] Smackdown Challenge!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 1107519" data-attributes="member: 7211"><p>I would try a barbarian build seeing as you are guaranteed 12 hp a level. Since you have 17 levels to work with you can even afford to take a template like half-dragon, half-celestial, etc. Barbs got powered up in 3.5 and things like Indomitable Will make even a straight barbarian a fairly house build.</p><p></p><p>17th level human barbarian (with 28 Con)</p><p>a. 357 hit points, 408 in a rage.</p><p>b. rage 5/day, dont get tired after rage, gain +3 vs Will saves and another +4 vs enchantments (so +7 vs enchantments in a rage).</p><p>c. DR 4/-, +5 to AC and reflex vs traps, improved uncanny dodge (21st level rogue to sneak attack him).</p><p></p><p>Only problem is merely 7 feats (if human). I suggest Track, Power Attack, Improved Bull Rush, Weapon Focus, Lightning Reflexes, Improved Critical, and Iron Will. I. Bull Rush is a little weak, can always substitute for Improved Initiative. Take Leadership if its available.</p><p></p><p>Get an Adamantine +5 weapon and youre ready to rock.</p><p></p><p>As an aside I think the dwarven defender build below would have 346 hp with 380 in a stance (and would have 1 more feat over the barbarian [not counting prerequisite Dodge, Endurance, and Toughness]). I feel without some of the non-core feats the defender isn't as viable as it is otherwise and would rather have the barbarian with more hp, more strength during a rage (that lasts 15 rounds and allows you to move vs 14 rounds of standing in the same place). Also, the dwarf is winded after the stance whereas the barbarian isn't. Keep in mind the goal is "race to the finish", dwarven defender (with 20 ft move vs barbarians probable 40 ft move) just seems like the wrong "tough" build.</p><p></p><p>Technik</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Technik4, post: 1107519, member: 7211"] I would try a barbarian build seeing as you are guaranteed 12 hp a level. Since you have 17 levels to work with you can even afford to take a template like half-dragon, half-celestial, etc. Barbs got powered up in 3.5 and things like Indomitable Will make even a straight barbarian a fairly house build. 17th level human barbarian (with 28 Con) a. 357 hit points, 408 in a rage. b. rage 5/day, dont get tired after rage, gain +3 vs Will saves and another +4 vs enchantments (so +7 vs enchantments in a rage). c. DR 4/-, +5 to AC and reflex vs traps, improved uncanny dodge (21st level rogue to sneak attack him). Only problem is merely 7 feats (if human). I suggest Track, Power Attack, Improved Bull Rush, Weapon Focus, Lightning Reflexes, Improved Critical, and Iron Will. I. Bull Rush is a little weak, can always substitute for Improved Initiative. Take Leadership if its available. Get an Adamantine +5 weapon and youre ready to rock. As an aside I think the dwarven defender build below would have 346 hp with 380 in a stance (and would have 1 more feat over the barbarian [not counting prerequisite Dodge, Endurance, and Toughness]). I feel without some of the non-core feats the defender isn't as viable as it is otherwise and would rather have the barbarian with more hp, more strength during a rage (that lasts 15 rounds and allows you to move vs 14 rounds of standing in the same place). Also, the dwarf is winded after the stance whereas the barbarian isn't. Keep in mind the goal is "race to the finish", dwarven defender (with 20 ft move vs barbarians probable 40 ft move) just seems like the wrong "tough" build. Technik [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
[3.5] Smackdown Challenge!
Top