Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 975111" data-attributes="member: 6875">Back that assertation up -- I have said I think the EnWorld community is no different, in it's distribution of player/GM types, from what could be expected formt he average of the D&D playerbase as a whole.Your position woudl be that EnWorld DIFFERS; combined with suggesting I "think too highly of myself" for holding my position, it would seem you believe EnWorld's community is INFERIOR to ordinary, average gamers.Back that up.Not everyone here is net-savvy; not everyone here is opinionated (some folks come to ask questions and gain answers, after all); not everyone is argumentative.I have not observed that trend here.  I've seen a lot of brags, a question or two of "is this done right", and plenty of "yep, but ..." 's.And your point is ... ?Funny; like I said, they're GREAT at writing up scenarios, they simply hold the opinion that, blemishes and all, they prefer to stick with the whole rulesset as published (and possibly as officially errata'd).I value ability at making and running good scenarios over ability to tweak the rules.  If you have a great scenario and so-so rules, I can ignore the rules and RP the scenario, having a grand old time.If you have a so-so scenario and great rules, FFS, I might as well be playing Risk or something.That's a line for threat ranges, where none was needed before.Then there will be entries for house-ruled SF and GSF.... and, I don't know how many OTHER little screwups have been wormed on, now.  I have to go over the changes with a fine-toothed friggin' comb, to make sure I don't miss a NEW problem where none existed before....I won't even dignify your auto-generated spam with a response.</blockquote>

Verification