Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
[3.5] TWF + rogue = overpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shurai" data-source="post: 863715"><p>In a nutshell, some folks think that the new version of Two-Weapon Fighting, when taken by rogues, will be overpowered. What do you all think? Will too many rogues take the new version of the feat?</p><p></p><p>It certainly has the ring of realism. In real life, the kind of non-military anything-goes fighting that rogues prefer certainly has precedent. Most small-weapon fighting systems or styles have use of the off-hand and feet integrated into them, and that could easily be construed as use of TWF with an unarmed attack and Improved Trip or the like. </p><p></p><p>Likewise, fighting with two weapons, matched or not, is a known roguish tendency that's well-supported by lots of swashbuckling & adventurous literature, such as various characters fighting rapier-dagger or rapier-main-gauche. In addition, it seems to be supported by historical evidence as well.</p><p></p><p>What about game balance? It's true that rogues will gain a pretty significant new ability, but I don't think it's necessarily the case that every time some class gets a new benefit that it will be 'broken.' For instance, most of the time the advantages are overestimated, and the drawbacks are seldom evaluated. In this case, it's true that although rogues will gain an extra attack, the loss of attack bonus is a bigger deal for them because they generally hit less often than a fighting class.</p><p></p><p>The real advantage, as many have said, is the extra sneak attack. But, this will only occur during the following subset of situations the rogue is likely to encounter: 1) the rogue is getting a full attack, and 2) the rogue is getting a sneak attack. So mostly this new change will effect rounds in which the rogue begins in a flanking position and doesn't move.</p><p></p><p>But, most rogues only have a good chance of hitting with Weapon Finesse, which is impossible before 3rd level. So taking the -2 to hit and getting the extra attack will end up sacrificing quite a bit, given the rogue's already-low attack bonus. However, after 3rd level, with both TWF and Finesse, the rogue is dealing a lot more damage at low levels. Later on, I expect that fighters will catch up and pass the rogue in number of attacks and hit probability. It's important to remember that a human rogue could very easily have precisely the same setup by 3rd level in 3.0, for one extra feat, yet not that many people complain about the overpowered dual-shortswording human rogue.</p><p></p><p>So anyway, I think that although we'll definitely see lots more rogues fighting with two weapons in Edition 3.5, I think this is probably okay, though I'm still mulling over the subtleties. Truly I think the real problem will be with nonhuman rogues, like those who get dex bonuses. Halflings, for instance, will now be much nastier around fourth and fifth level while flanking and full-attacking than they once were. Still, the rogue still has disadvantages, and outside this special situation the rogue will be the same as always.</p><p></p><p>What do you all think? Is any of my analysis off the mark? Anything I've missed? Do I over-use question marks?</p><p></p><p>-S</p><p></p><p>-S</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shurai, post: 863715"] In a nutshell, some folks think that the new version of Two-Weapon Fighting, when taken by rogues, will be overpowered. What do you all think? Will too many rogues take the new version of the feat? It certainly has the ring of realism. In real life, the kind of non-military anything-goes fighting that rogues prefer certainly has precedent. Most small-weapon fighting systems or styles have use of the off-hand and feet integrated into them, and that could easily be construed as use of TWF with an unarmed attack and Improved Trip or the like. Likewise, fighting with two weapons, matched or not, is a known roguish tendency that's well-supported by lots of swashbuckling & adventurous literature, such as various characters fighting rapier-dagger or rapier-main-gauche. In addition, it seems to be supported by historical evidence as well. What about game balance? It's true that rogues will gain a pretty significant new ability, but I don't think it's necessarily the case that every time some class gets a new benefit that it will be 'broken.' For instance, most of the time the advantages are overestimated, and the drawbacks are seldom evaluated. In this case, it's true that although rogues will gain an extra attack, the loss of attack bonus is a bigger deal for them because they generally hit less often than a fighting class. The real advantage, as many have said, is the extra sneak attack. But, this will only occur during the following subset of situations the rogue is likely to encounter: 1) the rogue is getting a full attack, and 2) the rogue is getting a sneak attack. So mostly this new change will effect rounds in which the rogue begins in a flanking position and doesn't move. But, most rogues only have a good chance of hitting with Weapon Finesse, which is impossible before 3rd level. So taking the -2 to hit and getting the extra attack will end up sacrificing quite a bit, given the rogue's already-low attack bonus. However, after 3rd level, with both TWF and Finesse, the rogue is dealing a lot more damage at low levels. Later on, I expect that fighters will catch up and pass the rogue in number of attacks and hit probability. It's important to remember that a human rogue could very easily have precisely the same setup by 3rd level in 3.0, for one extra feat, yet not that many people complain about the overpowered dual-shortswording human rogue. So anyway, I think that although we'll definitely see lots more rogues fighting with two weapons in Edition 3.5, I think this is probably okay, though I'm still mulling over the subtleties. Truly I think the real problem will be with nonhuman rogues, like those who get dex bonuses. Halflings, for instance, will now be much nastier around fourth and fifth level while flanking and full-attacking than they once were. Still, the rogue still has disadvantages, and outside this special situation the rogue will be the same as always. What do you all think? Is any of my analysis off the mark? Anything I've missed? Do I over-use question marks? -S -S [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
[3.5] TWF + rogue = overpowered?
Top