D&D 3E/3.5 [3.5] unnamed bonuses stack or not?

[RObiN-HoOD]

I read 3.5 DMG p.21 describing bonus types but I couldn't found what's happening with the unnamed bonus.

Do they stack or not? (please provide page number)

 

[the Jester]

I was under the impression that there aren't any unnamed bonuses in 3.5?

 

[LokiDR]

I was under the impression that there aren't any unnamed bonuses in 3.5?

There is at least one source: barbarian rage.

 

[Dr_Rictus]

If they don't have a rule for unnamed bonuses, they're going to be sorry the first time they forget to specify the type of a bonus.

 

[kreynolds]

There is at least one source: barbarian rage.

Don't most of the feats, like Skill Focus, still use unnamed bonuses?

 

[Arienys]

Synergy bonuses...

I don't actually have the 3.5 PH yet, but I have it from a reputable source that the bonuses from synergy between complementary skills are unnamed bonuses now, too.

 

[the Jester]

Wow... I got my 3.5 books yesterday and just have to say, I heard wrong. There are still tons of unnamed bonuses.

As far as I know, unnamed bonuses still stack, but I'm only up to the feats chapter in the PHB...

 

[Lord Ravinous]

I dont think two unnamed bonuses would stack, because they're bothe unnamed, and hence the same kind of bonus.

 

[Grazzt]

I dont think two unnamed bonuses would stack, because they're bothe unnamed, and hence the same kind of bonus.

Nope- in 3e unnamed bonuses stacked. And AFAIK they still stack in 3.5


*EDIT*: Page 305 in the 3.5 PHB....under Bonus

"Bonuses that dont have a specific type ALWAYS stack with all bonuses."

Just like in 3e.