Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranes" data-source="post: 6200065" data-attributes="member: 4826">3.5 with all sorts of idiosyncratic exceptions and inclusions from other sources (including some 3.0). However, with the greatest of respect to PF enthusiasts, I would point out that my preference stems from having had such a good time with all the 3.x stuff at my disposal before PF came out that I've never played (or read much) PF. My preference is therefore not based on any comparison between the two.I don't doubt that PF is good: I still get a lot of use and good tips from Paizo's Dungeon and Dragon magazines.</blockquote>