Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4260274" data-attributes="member: 15538">Not. Railroading.Conditions are not railroading. Without limitations, you have no game at all.GM: You see a 10' x 10' room. There is an orc in it. He is guarding a pie. What do you do?Player 1: I draw my lightsaber.Player 2: I loot his dead body.Player 3: I knock both of the orcs out by throwing them against each other.Player 1 is not accepting the limitations of his role; he is (at least in this example) a D&D character, not a Jedi. Player 2 is not accepting the limitations of the system on his actions; he has not yet defeated the orc. Player 3 is not accepting a limitation on his described actions; in this case, he is not accepting that there is only one orc, and that D&D does not have a "knock two thugs together" manuever.To railroad is to curtail available choices. But characters in a dungeon face only pseudo-realistic limitations. Railroading prevents meaningful choices.A dungeon setting is simply a kind of physical setting with its own limitations. It is not railroading any more than stating a Marvel Super Heroes game is taking place in New York City or Gamma World on post-apocalyptic Earth or that a vampire in a Vampire:The Requiem game awakens hungry and alone in a warehouse. The dungeon IS the story. At worst, PCs can leave the dungeon, if that is physically possible, and ignore its contents.</blockquote>