Imaro
Legend
I remember when SW Saga ed. was being advertised as a preview for 4e. Now I bought the game and thought it was a good game, that actually addressed some of the "issues" I see people bring up in regards to 3.5. My players loved it and it was easier to GM than 3.5...Thus I pre-ordered 4e under the assumption that SW saga was a preview of what I would be getting...
Now that I've gotten, and played, 4e... I can't help but feel something went wrong. The game hasn't excited or thrilled my group, and they in fact have asked me to stop running 4e and to run either a SW Saga game or Changeling the Lost game.
Now the last time I ran SW Saga was a while ago, so I don't remember the intricacies of the system... but I was wondering if anyone can compare the differences between the two systems. Also, how do other people feel about the two systems. Do you prefer SW Saga's system to 4e or 4e's system to SW Saga? Why?
I'm just curious as I haven't seen the two games talked about together much, and I just got the Knights of the Old Republic campaign book (excellent product by the way.) and it's got me kinda hyped to run a Star Wars game.
Now that I've gotten, and played, 4e... I can't help but feel something went wrong. The game hasn't excited or thrilled my group, and they in fact have asked me to stop running 4e and to run either a SW Saga game or Changeling the Lost game.
Now the last time I ran SW Saga was a while ago, so I don't remember the intricacies of the system... but I was wondering if anyone can compare the differences between the two systems. Also, how do other people feel about the two systems. Do you prefer SW Saga's system to 4e or 4e's system to SW Saga? Why?
I'm just curious as I haven't seen the two games talked about together much, and I just got the Knights of the Old Republic campaign book (excellent product by the way.) and it's got me kinda hyped to run a Star Wars game.