Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vyvyan Basterd" data-source="post: 4850933" data-attributes="member: 4892">As a fan of 1-1-1 movement I have to agree with Jeff. The mathematical proof does show larger deviation than N0Man is describing. 1-2-1 does model reality in most cases better than 1-1-1.But I'm not trying to model reality. I'm just using the simple 1-1-1 mechanic to represent each figure's location in regard to another. And to me it doesn't matter that a character under 1-1-1 moves 36.05 feet (7.21 x 5) diagonally while a 1-2-1 mover has to spend 40 feet of speed to move the same distance. All that matters is that every 1-1-1 mover with a speed of 6 can move the same in-game distance.As to the "rotating map" arguments. This would only matter if you actually started rotating the grid mid-combat, IMO.</blockquote>