Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E combat and powers: How to keep the baby and not the bathwater?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5862251" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>I'd point out something else here.</p><p></p><p>By adding in a -5 cumulative penalty (or whatever the meaningful penalty is), all we've done is shift the mark one step to the left. One of the big criticisms of the encounter powers is, "Why can't I do this more than once?" Why doesn't the same argument apply to this? "Why can't I do this more than twice?" After all, after the second time, with the whacking great penalty, you realistically can't do it more than twice.</p><p></p><p>Sure, you can try, but, you'd have to try twenty times to get it. Not likely going to happen. Even people with really bad math skills can likely figure out that if they need a 20 to do something, they're likely going to try something else.</p><p></p><p>And, if the penalty isn't cumulative, then we're right back into the same boat as 3e - the specialist spams the same thing over and over again, while the non-focused guy might try it once in a blue moon.</p><p></p><p>You could get the same result as the cumulative penalty simply by saying, "Encounter powers work twice per encounter". You get pretty much the same result (outside of that 5% chance of rolling a 20). </p><p></p><p>If I can do something twice fairly reliably, then why can't I do it three times? This is exactly the same criticism of the power system with an extra +1 tacked on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 5862251, member: 22779"] I'd point out something else here. By adding in a -5 cumulative penalty (or whatever the meaningful penalty is), all we've done is shift the mark one step to the left. One of the big criticisms of the encounter powers is, "Why can't I do this more than once?" Why doesn't the same argument apply to this? "Why can't I do this more than twice?" After all, after the second time, with the whacking great penalty, you realistically can't do it more than twice. Sure, you can try, but, you'd have to try twenty times to get it. Not likely going to happen. Even people with really bad math skills can likely figure out that if they need a 20 to do something, they're likely going to try something else. And, if the penalty isn't cumulative, then we're right back into the same boat as 3e - the specialist spams the same thing over and over again, while the non-focused guy might try it once in a blue moon. You could get the same result as the cumulative penalty simply by saying, "Encounter powers work twice per encounter". You get pretty much the same result (outside of that 5% chance of rolling a 20). If I can do something twice fairly reliably, then why can't I do it three times? This is exactly the same criticism of the power system with an extra +1 tacked on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E combat and powers: How to keep the baby and not the bathwater?
Top