Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4E Cosmology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9581436" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Okay.</p><p></p><p><em>How can that be the case AND ALSO</em>, at one and the same time, in one and the same place (Toril), in one and the same sense, there is not, at all, any restriction whatsoever?</p><p></p><p>That's the thing I'm catching on here. Either there is a restriction on Toril's Astral Plane, or there isn't.</p><p></p><p>If there is--if it is, as the book in question says, a "channeled" transitive plane--then it can't be the case that FOR TORIL<em>,</em> the Astral Plane really truly does exist everywhere and allow you to go anywhere you like etc., etc. If there isn't such a restriction, then the World Tree model is simply, straight-up, objectively <em>wrong</em> about the nature of reality. It's not "oh that's just one story we tell", it's just...flat-out incorrect on an enormous swathe of how reality works for Toril.</p><p></p><p>Only one of these things can be true. This is a <em>hard</em> binary. Either there is a restriction, or there isn't. If there is, then the World Tree model is simply correct and the other models that claim you can <em>plane shift</em> directly between any two Outer/Inner planes are just straight-up wrong about that, or there isn't, and the World Tree model is simply straight-up wrong about that.</p><p></p><p>There is no in-between here. We're talking about one specific plane (so it is the same place). There is only one possible sense, either you can do the thing, or you can't. And we're talking about a single specific time (late 15th century by the current FR calendar, IIRC?), so that doesn't affect things either. We have two competing claims:</p><p></p><p>1. "You cannot, even in principle, <em>plane shift</em> directly between two different planes in the late 15th century on Toril."</p><p>2. "You can, at least in principle, <em>plane shift</em> directly between two different planes in the late 15th century on Toril."</p><p></p><p>One or the other of these claims must be true. The World Tree claims the former, very explicitly. The World Axis and Great Wheel claim the latter.</p><p></p><p>Hence, it is <em>not possible</em> that all three cosmologies can be said to reasonably reflect the observable reality of Toril, the default setting of 5.x (even though Greyhawk is getting renewed interest). Even before we start looking at how the World Tree claims there are specific planes that just straight-up don't exist in the World Axis or Great Wheel, and likewise that there are planes that exist in the Great Wheel that don't exist in the other two etc.!</p><p></p><p>Now, maybe we can say these are all ad-hoc models getting constantly revised and updated as new discoveries are made, or as changes to reality occur. If that's the case, <em>they should in fact explain that</em>, rather than just leaving it up to implication that "well, the models only make sense if we the readers continuously retcon them, so obviously we have to continuously retcon them." That is, at the very least, extremely sloppy worldbuilding.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9581436, member: 6790260"] Okay. [I]How can that be the case AND ALSO[/I], at one and the same time, in one and the same place (Toril), in one and the same sense, there is not, at all, any restriction whatsoever? That's the thing I'm catching on here. Either there is a restriction on Toril's Astral Plane, or there isn't. If there is--if it is, as the book in question says, a "channeled" transitive plane--then it can't be the case that FOR TORIL[I],[/I] the Astral Plane really truly does exist everywhere and allow you to go anywhere you like etc., etc. If there isn't such a restriction, then the World Tree model is simply, straight-up, objectively [I]wrong[/I] about the nature of reality. It's not "oh that's just one story we tell", it's just...flat-out incorrect on an enormous swathe of how reality works for Toril. Only one of these things can be true. This is a [I]hard[/I] binary. Either there is a restriction, or there isn't. If there is, then the World Tree model is simply correct and the other models that claim you can [I]plane shift[/I] directly between any two Outer/Inner planes are just straight-up wrong about that, or there isn't, and the World Tree model is simply straight-up wrong about that. There is no in-between here. We're talking about one specific plane (so it is the same place). There is only one possible sense, either you can do the thing, or you can't. And we're talking about a single specific time (late 15th century by the current FR calendar, IIRC?), so that doesn't affect things either. We have two competing claims: 1. "You cannot, even in principle, [I]plane shift[/I] directly between two different planes in the late 15th century on Toril." 2. "You can, at least in principle, [I]plane shift[/I] directly between two different planes in the late 15th century on Toril." One or the other of these claims must be true. The World Tree claims the former, very explicitly. The World Axis and Great Wheel claim the latter. Hence, it is [I]not possible[/I] that all three cosmologies can be said to reasonably reflect the observable reality of Toril, the default setting of 5.x (even though Greyhawk is getting renewed interest). Even before we start looking at how the World Tree claims there are specific planes that just straight-up don't exist in the World Axis or Great Wheel, and likewise that there are planes that exist in the Great Wheel that don't exist in the other two etc.! Now, maybe we can say these are all ad-hoc models getting constantly revised and updated as new discoveries are made, or as changes to reality occur. If that's the case, [I]they should in fact explain that[/I], rather than just leaving it up to implication that "well, the models only make sense if we the readers continuously retcon them, so obviously we have to continuously retcon them." That is, at the very least, extremely sloppy worldbuilding. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
4E Cosmology
Top