Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E d20 Superheroes - I want that too!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vigilance" data-source="post: 4198449" data-attributes="member: 4275"><p>Classes do what classes always do: they identify your archetype and the way you play the game.</p><p></p><p>Powers are things that help you, but dont define your archetype.</p><p></p><p>This may seem counter-intuitive, but it works. </p><p></p><p>For example, Vision and Shadowcat both have desolidification, just as Plastic Man and Martian Manhunter can both change shape.</p><p></p><p>Are those powers what define how they operate in a team setting? </p><p></p><p>I don't believe that they do. Vision isn't generally skulking around in the background any more than Shadowcat is generally running up to punch guys.</p><p></p><p>Of course, you need to keep two things in mind: a character's archetype is much easier to pick out in a team book, in fact, team books are better rpg fodder in general, since they are actual adventuring groups; second, yes you can find cases where Vision has been stealthy and yes you can find cases where Shadowcat has punched someone.</p><p></p><p>If your argument is that classes dont work because classes should be straight jackets, I disagree. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I couldnt disagree more. There were archetypes listed by the original designers of D&D for every character class. Sometimes they were historical, such as the Cleric being based on the Knights Hospitlar, but there are fantasy archetypes for D&D characters.</p><p></p><p>They just didn't choose genre over good design.</p><p></p><p>So if you're asking me if I would institute a rule I thought sucked becuase it would make a better emulation of comics, the answer is no. </p><p></p><p>This is also why Superman is so hard to handle for most comic games. A reader doesn't care how much more powerful he is than the group. Fellow players probably would.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When I design a supers game, and I guess at this point I'll mention that I have, Blood and Vigilance, and it's sold quite well and gotten good reviews (and it's class based), I have two goals in this order: make it a good game; make it a good emulation of the team comic experience.</p><p></p><p>I realize I am in the minority on this issue and Im ok with that.</p><p></p><p>But I also have given this a lot of thought as a long time supers gamer.</p><p></p><p>Ive played more Champions, Hero, GURPs and M&M than I can count. Those games have a lot going for them.</p><p></p><p>But point based systems also have drawbacks, that are handled quite nicely through class-based games. </p><p></p><p>Im not coming at this issue half cocked.</p><p></p><p>Unlike most people in this thread, I have actually played superhero games both ways: point based and class based.</p><p></p><p>You can emulate genre characters, and both games work well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vigilance, post: 4198449, member: 4275"] Classes do what classes always do: they identify your archetype and the way you play the game. Powers are things that help you, but dont define your archetype. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it works. For example, Vision and Shadowcat both have desolidification, just as Plastic Man and Martian Manhunter can both change shape. Are those powers what define how they operate in a team setting? I don't believe that they do. Vision isn't generally skulking around in the background any more than Shadowcat is generally running up to punch guys. Of course, you need to keep two things in mind: a character's archetype is much easier to pick out in a team book, in fact, team books are better rpg fodder in general, since they are actual adventuring groups; second, yes you can find cases where Vision has been stealthy and yes you can find cases where Shadowcat has punched someone. If your argument is that classes dont work because classes should be straight jackets, I disagree. I couldnt disagree more. There were archetypes listed by the original designers of D&D for every character class. Sometimes they were historical, such as the Cleric being based on the Knights Hospitlar, but there are fantasy archetypes for D&D characters. They just didn't choose genre over good design. So if you're asking me if I would institute a rule I thought sucked becuase it would make a better emulation of comics, the answer is no. This is also why Superman is so hard to handle for most comic games. A reader doesn't care how much more powerful he is than the group. Fellow players probably would. When I design a supers game, and I guess at this point I'll mention that I have, Blood and Vigilance, and it's sold quite well and gotten good reviews (and it's class based), I have two goals in this order: make it a good game; make it a good emulation of the team comic experience. I realize I am in the minority on this issue and Im ok with that. But I also have given this a lot of thought as a long time supers gamer. Ive played more Champions, Hero, GURPs and M&M than I can count. Those games have a lot going for them. But point based systems also have drawbacks, that are handled quite nicely through class-based games. Im not coming at this issue half cocked. Unlike most people in this thread, I have actually played superhero games both ways: point based and class based. You can emulate genre characters, and both games work well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
4E d20 Superheroes - I want that too!
Top