Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Firebeetle" data-source="post: 5431972" data-attributes="member: 34506">I'd rather eat a bowl of warm monkey feces than play 3.5 or Pathfinder. I've been playing D&D for 30 years, starting with the original red box and through all the editions. I've never had as much fun playing as I have with 4e. I have many fond memories of the past, but now is what I think of being a "Golden Age" for my roleplaying experience. Even if WotC were to close shop tomorrow (which they aren't, I think all this speculation is a bit ridiculous) I would continue to play 4e until I die. I love it that much, and I have enough tools to work with it forever or adapt into other genres (I'm already considering sci-fi.) I find Pathfinder a giant step backwards. I found 3.5 very frustrating toward the end and considered leaving rpgs forever. At the very least, I was thinking how to adapt my minis and maps to another system. Of course, the 3.5 bard (my all-time favorite class since 1e) sucked and I don't see the Pathfinder one as much of an improvement. It certainly doesn't compare with the 4e uberrock bard.  I'm 4e until I die. I'm still confused how they are able to do it, when I understood the original OGL was something WotC could stop whenever they wanted. Does anyone know?</blockquote>