Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 4369595" data-attributes="member: 158">Glad to see people are trying to get along. Let's try to keep discussion on topic.As for me, I like the parcel system because the &quot;wealth by level&quot; charts in 3E was a BEAR for me and my players to keep track of. I don't think a single DM in my group has ever gotten it right, and we've always, ALWAYS overshot the target significantly. At least by the parcel, we might overshoot by a small amount, but not by a huge margin.Those who don't want to use &quot;parcels&quot; can just treat the top number on the chart as a master value chart, adding in the magic weapons they decide and just divvying up the money across the characters' level as they see fit. Me, I can take one simple parcel, and break it apart a hundred different ways in a single encounter to make it look like there's never been a &quot;parcel&quot; at all. Only the astute DM's could track it back and say &quot;that was parcel number 7, wasn't it?&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Henry, post: 4369595, member: 158"] Glad to see people are trying to get along. Let's try to keep discussion on topic. As for me, I like the parcel system because the "wealth by level" charts in 3E was a BEAR for me and my players to keep track of. I don't think a single DM in my group has ever gotten it right, and we've always, ALWAYS overshot the target significantly. At least by the parcel, we might overshoot by a small amount, but not by a huge margin. Those who don't want to use "parcels" can just treat the top number on the chart as a master value chart, adding in the magic weapons they decide and just divvying up the money across the characters' level as they see fit. Me, I can take one simple parcel, and break it apart a hundred different ways in a single encounter to make it look like there's never been a "parcel" at all. Only the astute DM's could track it back and say "that was parcel number 7, wasn't it?" [/QUOTE]

Verification