Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 3883258" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey guys! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Incorrect. While they have mentioned that an exact conversion is impossible (and an exact conversion between ANY iteration has been impossible) if you have been keeping up with the blogs you would know that in numerous playtest cases the people have converted 3/3.5E characters over to 4E.The fact that the game is still class and level based should tell you that such characters can be converted without much difficulty. Try harder. You never mentioned that once during your outbursts. We know lots about general changes. What they haven't shown a lot of are specifics - which makes sense given thats what the core rulebooks are for.On the contrary I am sure they expect some people for the new system, some against and some indifferent. But you can't criticise them for trying to get people interested in 4E...the idiocy would be in not doing that. How exactly are they doing this?While there may be 'some' spill over from WoW, any such minor changes appear to be to benefit D&D, not hinder it.You contradict yourself.Below you categorically state there is disillusionment with 3/3.5E, but in this statement you suggest they should 'leave it alone', rather than fix a problem.So you admit that gamers are disillusioned with 3/3.5E but for some reason you are against 4E even though its raison d'etre is to fix the problems of 3/3.5E...and above you state they shouldn't try to fix it.</blockquote>

Verification