Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 4284247" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey all! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Trying to compose a list of 4E things I'll probably have to fix in terms of mechanics or fluff...and dante I don't need any snarky "everything in 4E needs fixed" type comment. All other suggestions welcome. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />MechanicsSize Rules: Okay, I can understand why things were capped at Gargantuan this time around (the miniatures). But a couple of things are bugging me.Firstly, the sizes seem to approximate the following:Tiny 1-2 ft.Small 2-4Medium 4-8Large 8-16Huge 16-24Gargantuan 24-32 or potentially bigger.Yet for all that the Gargantuan models seem to follow the 32-64 scale, its just that their bases don't.Outside Space and Reach obviously size doesn't have any other bearing on the game now, so its less important, but it still would have been nice to see it make more sense.Carrying Capacity: Almost certainly needs a modifier for size.FluffSlaad: They just seem to have made a mess of what went before and unfortunately not replaced it with something better. Are Black Slaad the new Death Slaad?</blockquote>

Verification