Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e "Anyspell," Would You Allow the Enclosed Spell?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 7982178" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>I think you just word it like:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like the templating doesn't matter <em>that</em> much. Just describe what the spell does. It's homebrew so you'll be at the table to adjudicate.</p><p></p><p>As for my opinion on the spell? No, I don't really care for it and would probably not allow it. Unlike others here, I don't think it's too powerful. It's very flexible, yes, but not too powerful. The problem is that the spell existed in the first place to solve a problem that no longer exists.</p><p></p><p>As you say, this spell existed in prior editions. However, in 3.5e and earlier, you had to prepare spells into a specific slot. You didn't choose which spell to cast on the fly throughout the day. Not even cantrips! Spells like Anyspell, Limited Wish, and Mordenkainen's Lucubration existed because spellcasters had to make their exact spell selections at the start of the day rather than on the fly. Spontaneous casting wasn't really a thing except for the Sorcerer, who gave up a considerable amount of power for that benefit (no bonus feats, slower spell progression, limited spells known). Spellcasters used to be significantly more potent, but they were <em>much</em> less flexible than they are now. That's why the above spells don't exist in 5e. They're spell designs that don't belong in the game anymore because that problem has been solved, and without spell preparation the spells simply don't feel appropriate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 7982178, member: 6777737"] I think you just word it like: Like the templating doesn't matter [I]that[/I] much. Just describe what the spell does. It's homebrew so you'll be at the table to adjudicate. As for my opinion on the spell? No, I don't really care for it and would probably not allow it. Unlike others here, I don't think it's too powerful. It's very flexible, yes, but not too powerful. The problem is that the spell existed in the first place to solve a problem that no longer exists. As you say, this spell existed in prior editions. However, in 3.5e and earlier, you had to prepare spells into a specific slot. You didn't choose which spell to cast on the fly throughout the day. Not even cantrips! Spells like Anyspell, Limited Wish, and Mordenkainen's Lucubration existed because spellcasters had to make their exact spell selections at the start of the day rather than on the fly. Spontaneous casting wasn't really a thing except for the Sorcerer, who gave up a considerable amount of power for that benefit (no bonus feats, slower spell progression, limited spells known). Spellcasters used to be significantly more potent, but they were [I]much[/I] less flexible than they are now. That's why the above spells don't exist in 5e. They're spell designs that don't belong in the game anymore because that problem has been solved, and without spell preparation the spells simply don't feel appropriate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e "Anyspell," Would You Allow the Enclosed Spell?
Top