Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Casimir Liber" data-source="post: 8869284" data-attributes="member: 6947639">ok coming in...yes micefolk will prove a headache in a few ways...the canon in later times leaves something to be desired but changing the canon then...changes the canon. We lose the aliteration in the genderless update, which is mildly annoying. Also, I like to do monsters that bring something extra and unusual to combat. Making them stealthy and small (and nothing else) renders them very similar to goblins. Musing on what else we could do that would keep in canon.NB: shadowdancer typo fixed and updated to <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/3164860-shadowdancer" target="_blank">here</a>Anyway - I think varying ACs is a bit of overkill for the dragon warrior (AC is a bit flattened in 5e anyway), other comments taken on board and adjusting momentarily. Taken onbard other tweaks - gone for CON 17 and 10d8+30 for 75hp.The movement issue is a vexing one. I'd be happier with 20ft movement if it had some other combat option that gave it extra manouevring to surprise opponents. Was musing on Fighter Student of War Maneuvers such as Brace, Riposte, Parry, or some other moving thing. Otherwise it's just cannon fodder.</blockquote>