Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ilgatto" data-source="post: 8898744" data-attributes="member: 86051">OKEr, yes, I liked the difference and the current text is what I was aiming for. Pray forgive the confusion.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> OK but note that this excludes sprites and imps (5EMM, p. 6).I suppose specifying size along such lines as &quot;2 1/2 foot or larger&quot; would be undesirable given typical 5E wording?Maybe &quot;size Tiny or bigger&quot; since 5EMM defines size T as 2.5x2.5 ft?Hmm..., come to think of it, perhaps it doesn't really matter that DW traps don't activate to attack sprites or imps or similarly small creatures.Bah! Another one I didn't see earlier, although perhaps it doesn't matter in English.Starting with &quot;A dragon tooth&quot; singular and then switching to plural in the next sentence is perhaps undesirable?&quot;A dragon tooth is a reptilian fang three to six inches long, small enough to fit in a pocket. Usually found in pairs or sets of four, dragon teeth are all canine teeth from a deceased dragon of young age or older, (...)&quot;On the other hand, this doesn't feel as right as I would have thought either.&quot;dragon warrior&quot;?&quot;warrior&quot;?&quot;... warrior, and the tooth is wasted&quot;? Too much?&quot;dragon warrior&quot;?&quot;warrior&quot;?Pff! Please remind me to never say &quot;good to go&quot; again! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ilgatto, post: 8898744, member: 86051"] OK Er, yes, I liked the difference and the current text is what I was aiming for. Pray forgive the confusion. :) OK but note that this excludes sprites and imps (5EMM, p. 6). I suppose specifying size along such lines as "2 1/2 foot or larger" would be undesirable given typical 5E wording? Maybe "size Tiny or bigger" since 5EMM defines size T as 2.5x2.5 ft? Hmm..., come to think of it, perhaps it doesn't really matter that DW traps don't activate to attack sprites or imps or similarly small creatures. Bah! Another one I didn't see earlier, although perhaps it doesn't matter in English. Starting with "A dragon tooth" singular and then switching to plural in the next sentence is perhaps undesirable? "A [I]dragon tooth[/I] is a reptilian fang three to six inches long, small enough to fit in a pocket. Usually found in pairs or sets of four, [I]dragon teeth[/I] are all canine teeth from a deceased dragon of young age or older, (...)" On the other hand, this doesn't feel as right as I would have thought either. "dragon warrior"? "warrior"? "... warrior, and the tooth is wasted"? Too much? "dragon warrior"? "warrior"? Pff! Please remind me to never say "good to go" again! :) [/QUOTE]

Verification