Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e EPIC MONSTER UPDATES
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 7216368" data-attributes="member: 83242"><p>Thank you! That is the most important thing, and the hardest thing, with these first drafts: trying to get their theme / flavor correct. I would definitely appreciate any feedback you can provide</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for your thoughts, I look forward to getting some more of your insight. Now, here are my thoughts. </p><p></p><p>In general I think it is OK for epic threats to be more complex and challenging. They will simply demand more from the DM than the standard monster. They are, after all, epic! I try to give my epic monsters lots of options, but I also try to make them that so they can be run simply if desired. Now, Tiamat is a bit unique and extreme, but she still illustrates some of my primary goals with epic design: 1) capture the them/flavor of the monster, 2) provide options and complexity befitting epic threats, 3) provide a simple combat option, and 4) make them viable solo threats. Let me explain:</p><p></p><p>1) Tiamat's heads have separate spell list because it ties back to her original design in the 1e MM. To me, it is part of her flavor.</p><p></p><p>2) Tiamat is a bit more complex than most because of her 5 heads, and this magnified by each head having its own spell list. But, I feel, she should be complex. To fully exploit all she can to a DM needs to really know his/her stuff, including probably having spells pretty well memorized. However, with that being said...</p><p></p><p>3) Tiamat's spells are extra flavor and not needed at all to run an interesting and exiting battle. They are flavor and there for those DMs who want and can use them, but you could not use them at all and they would not change her CR. Her best damage option (and thus what is important for CR) is always her breath weapon and then her physical attacks. She can be run without spells completely, if someone wants to.</p><p></p><p>4) In order to be a solo threat Tiamat needs to replace 4-5 monsters to keep PCs occupied. In her case, she partly accomplishes this with her 5 heads. Her stat block is more complex, but I don't think a battle with her is any more complex (and probably less so) than one against 4-5 separate epic monsters.</p><p></p><p>Now, like I said, Tiamat is a bit extreme because of her 5 heads, so I don't see her getting a lot simpler. She is due for a big over hall soon (once we complete the Great Wyrm dragons) and she will actually be getting a little more complex. The redesign will hearken back to the original Tiamat and provide a separate pool of HP for each head, so they can be knocked out discretely. Thus it will become important that each head will have its own spell list as she will not have access to those spells if that head is knocked out. </p><p></p><p>So, though I am unlikely to make Tiamat simpler as she is a bit of an outlier, I would really appreciate your feed back. These are 1st drafts, and one of the goals of the 2nd drafts is to simplify them. Thank you for your interest and I look forward to you thoughts and comments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dave2008, post: 7216368, member: 83242"] Thank you! That is the most important thing, and the hardest thing, with these first drafts: trying to get their theme / flavor correct. I would definitely appreciate any feedback you can provide Thank you for your thoughts, I look forward to getting some more of your insight. Now, here are my thoughts. In general I think it is OK for epic threats to be more complex and challenging. They will simply demand more from the DM than the standard monster. They are, after all, epic! I try to give my epic monsters lots of options, but I also try to make them that so they can be run simply if desired. Now, Tiamat is a bit unique and extreme, but she still illustrates some of my primary goals with epic design: 1) capture the them/flavor of the monster, 2) provide options and complexity befitting epic threats, 3) provide a simple combat option, and 4) make them viable solo threats. Let me explain: 1) Tiamat's heads have separate spell list because it ties back to her original design in the 1e MM. To me, it is part of her flavor. 2) Tiamat is a bit more complex than most because of her 5 heads, and this magnified by each head having its own spell list. But, I feel, she should be complex. To fully exploit all she can to a DM needs to really know his/her stuff, including probably having spells pretty well memorized. However, with that being said... 3) Tiamat's spells are extra flavor and not needed at all to run an interesting and exiting battle. They are flavor and there for those DMs who want and can use them, but you could not use them at all and they would not change her CR. Her best damage option (and thus what is important for CR) is always her breath weapon and then her physical attacks. She can be run without spells completely, if someone wants to. 4) In order to be a solo threat Tiamat needs to replace 4-5 monsters to keep PCs occupied. In her case, she partly accomplishes this with her 5 heads. Her stat block is more complex, but I don't think a battle with her is any more complex (and probably less so) than one against 4-5 separate epic monsters. Now, like I said, Tiamat is a bit extreme because of her 5 heads, so I don't see her getting a lot simpler. She is due for a big over hall soon (once we complete the Great Wyrm dragons) and she will actually be getting a little more complex. The redesign will hearken back to the original Tiamat and provide a separate pool of HP for each head, so they can be knocked out discretely. Thus it will become important that each head will have its own spell list as she will not have access to those spells if that head is knocked out. So, though I am unlikely to make Tiamat simpler as she is a bit of an outlier, I would really appreciate your feed back. These are 1st drafts, and one of the goals of the 2nd drafts is to simplify them. Thank you for your interest and I look forward to you thoughts and comments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e EPIC MONSTER UPDATES
Top