Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e isn't a Golden Age of D&D Lorewise, it's Silver at best.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8705888" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Worth noting that from a legal perspective unless a company is acting both truly perversely and failing to pay out to shareholders it rarely is a legal issue (i.e. if the company leadership decides to burn the company to the ground and funnel the profits to shareholders it's very unlikely they'll get sued - if they do the same and funnel the profits solely to management, they definitely will). There's a common myth that companies are required, legally, to "maximize shareholder profits" or the like, and indeed this myth is actively and intentionally spread by a lot of people who know better (including people at WSJ for god's sake! It's literally their job to know better! But WSJ is a ghastly rag these days, and has been for a couple of decades). There are companies who have that in their charter, but most have vastly more mild and flexible verbiage, if anything.</p><p></p><p>What it actually tends to be if a company is publicly traded is a <em>practical </em>issue.</p><p></p><p>Often, behaving ethically towards shareholders will cause people to sell your shares, because many and in some cases most shareholders are interested solely in short-term profits and absolutely nothing else. Which if you're publicly-traded, gives you a huge problem.</p><p></p><p>I question whether it is possible for a publicly-traded company to act in a truly ethical way in the longer-term, simply because sooner or later, the ethical approach and the need to convince flighty, short-termist shareholders/investors to not take their money away will conflict too much. We've seen this countless times with companies that are, by all accounts, on-book and real-terms successful/profitable, but that make a decision that lessens short-term shareholder gains, and then boom they plunge by 25%, 40%, even 80% or more. These aren't bad companies, but looking at long-term success can be hugely costly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8705888, member: 18"] Worth noting that from a legal perspective unless a company is acting both truly perversely and failing to pay out to shareholders it rarely is a legal issue (i.e. if the company leadership decides to burn the company to the ground and funnel the profits to shareholders it's very unlikely they'll get sued - if they do the same and funnel the profits solely to management, they definitely will). There's a common myth that companies are required, legally, to "maximize shareholder profits" or the like, and indeed this myth is actively and intentionally spread by a lot of people who know better (including people at WSJ for god's sake! It's literally their job to know better! But WSJ is a ghastly rag these days, and has been for a couple of decades). There are companies who have that in their charter, but most have vastly more mild and flexible verbiage, if anything. What it actually tends to be if a company is publicly traded is a [I]practical [/I]issue. Often, behaving ethically towards shareholders will cause people to sell your shares, because many and in some cases most shareholders are interested solely in short-term profits and absolutely nothing else. Which if you're publicly-traded, gives you a huge problem. I question whether it is possible for a publicly-traded company to act in a truly ethical way in the longer-term, simply because sooner or later, the ethical approach and the need to convince flighty, short-termist shareholders/investors to not take their money away will conflict too much. We've seen this countless times with companies that are, by all accounts, on-book and real-terms successful/profitable, but that make a decision that lessens short-term shareholder gains, and then boom they plunge by 25%, 40%, even 80% or more. These aren't bad companies, but looking at long-term success can be hugely costly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e isn't a Golden Age of D&D Lorewise, it's Silver at best.
Top