Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e isn't a Golden Age of D&D Lorewise, it's Silver at best.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8708808" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>My experience was that most people who chose to be members of the Factions <em>did actually</em> role-play being members of the Factions.</p><p></p><p>Now, whether were "deep into the philosophy" is obviously questionable, but it's the same with literally any RPG where your characters are members of organisations with philosophies or goals or the like. How many Clerics and Paladins actually go into depth about their religion, in D&D? I'd say a lot <em>fewer</em> than people who were members of Factions did, because a lot of people want to play Clerics or Paladins for what the class can do, whereas with Factions that was rarely the case - instead people who weren't "into" the Faction stuff chose to be Indeps or Outsiders the like.</p><p></p><p>Plus it was the '90s, and most of us were teenagers or early twenties, and this sort of stuff, back then, was I'm sorry to say "cool". It was. It was happening. It was zeitgeist-y. People were into it. I suspect in this era people might easily get into it again, actually, because I think people are bored of cynicism re: ideas and philosophies.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Precisely. I've always found the idea that generic settings appealed to everyone to be utterly bizarre, all the way back to being a kid. More specific settings appealed to a lot of groups, and it's notable that a lot of homebrew settings are anything but generic.</p><p></p><p>This is kind of a good example, because I can honestly say in 33 years of reading fantasy and playing fantasy RPGs I have never, ever, not even once wanted to make a "knock-off" version of any of the characters listed, let alone of the boring-but-nice people of Shannara, or "bag full of total wankers" of the Belgariad (seriously what a bunch of jerks! Way to make the Olympian pantheon look good!).</p><p></p><p>The Realms actually got lucky for me and provided character examples I might want to emulate just in time before I basically dumped the setting entirely - but most of those were rather peculiar Realms-specific people. I've always enjoyed playing characters from a very specific time and place, not generic or vague characters (and particularly not "me but an elf" unlike some people!).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8708808, member: 18"] My experience was that most people who chose to be members of the Factions [I]did actually[/I] role-play being members of the Factions. Now, whether were "deep into the philosophy" is obviously questionable, but it's the same with literally any RPG where your characters are members of organisations with philosophies or goals or the like. How many Clerics and Paladins actually go into depth about their religion, in D&D? I'd say a lot [I]fewer[/I] than people who were members of Factions did, because a lot of people want to play Clerics or Paladins for what the class can do, whereas with Factions that was rarely the case - instead people who weren't "into" the Faction stuff chose to be Indeps or Outsiders the like. Plus it was the '90s, and most of us were teenagers or early twenties, and this sort of stuff, back then, was I'm sorry to say "cool". It was. It was happening. It was zeitgeist-y. People were into it. I suspect in this era people might easily get into it again, actually, because I think people are bored of cynicism re: ideas and philosophies. Precisely. I've always found the idea that generic settings appealed to everyone to be utterly bizarre, all the way back to being a kid. More specific settings appealed to a lot of groups, and it's notable that a lot of homebrew settings are anything but generic. This is kind of a good example, because I can honestly say in 33 years of reading fantasy and playing fantasy RPGs I have never, ever, not even once wanted to make a "knock-off" version of any of the characters listed, let alone of the boring-but-nice people of Shannara, or "bag full of total wankers" of the Belgariad (seriously what a bunch of jerks! Way to make the Olympian pantheon look good!). The Realms actually got lucky for me and provided character examples I might want to emulate just in time before I basically dumped the setting entirely - but most of those were rather peculiar Realms-specific people. I've always enjoyed playing characters from a very specific time and place, not generic or vague characters (and particularly not "me but an elf" unlike some people!). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e isn't a Golden Age of D&D Lorewise, it's Silver at best.
Top