Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Players: How often have you been allowed to use 3PP?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9267562" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I wish the designers luck. They will be actively fighting the system's design if they want to do that. Trying to make a system fundamentally designed for the opposite purpose you intend is a draining effort, even when you're a designer able to actually rewrite things.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Because CR (I had understood it as "Challenge Rating"?) is not designed to be a functional system which accurately guides the DM on the impact and utility of a creature. It is designed to <em>feel</em> right, regardless of whether that works or not.</p><p></p><p>I have read what I consider credible claims from actual consultants for 5e that the CRs they use were, originally, developed using the formulae in the game. And then those formulae ended up being wrong. <em>A lot</em>. Instead of correcting the formulae, they <em>ad hoc</em> modified individual CRs of monsters that got enough playtesting to make a better guess at how strong they were. This is a big part of why CR is borderline useless, and why many experienced 5e DMs explicitly advice folks to just "wing it" or the like--because it generally won't make any difference, and may in fact <em>improve</em> encounter design because your intuitions are likely better than weak, often-faulty formulae.</p><p></p><p>This is part of why I found it so frustrating and baffling when Mearls said things like "math is easy, feel is hard" (paraphrased but he <em>did</em> explicitly say that "math is easy.") It's not easy! That's literally why we pay mathematicians and statisticians to do it!</p><p></p><p></p><p>I would agree that that is the biggest challenge for someone <em>who desires to be</em> a DM, and is a novice.</p><p></p><p>The biggest challenge for someone who <em>does not</em> desire to be a DM, regardless of whether they are a novice or an expert or anywhere in-between, is obviously that they do not desire to do it. Which is the problem I'm actually dealing with. I know maybe two or three people who have even the tiniest degree of willingness to DM, at all, ever, at any point in their natural lives. One is already running full games (and of a system I would prefer not to use if at all possible); the second is unable to play TTRPGs in general right now due to life issues; and the third wanted to, but I guess the game fell through, as I had been coaching them and then it just sort of petered out without further commentary.</p><p></p><p>If the issue is not "I'm scared of doing it" but rather "I really, really just do not want to do that thing," then no amount of coaching, of minimizing commitment level, of lowering the barriers, of zero-pressure encouragement, will ever get them from not being a DM to being a DM.</p><p></p><p>ETA: Also, I am <em>genuinely</em> impressed at how stable the distribution in the votes has been. Like, this is a pattern that's been going since there were maybe 20 voters. Four times as many voters, and the pattern remains almost completely unchanged.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9267562, member: 6790260"] I wish the designers luck. They will be actively fighting the system's design if they want to do that. Trying to make a system fundamentally designed for the opposite purpose you intend is a draining effort, even when you're a designer able to actually rewrite things. Because CR (I had understood it as "Challenge Rating"?) is not designed to be a functional system which accurately guides the DM on the impact and utility of a creature. It is designed to [I]feel[/I] right, regardless of whether that works or not. I have read what I consider credible claims from actual consultants for 5e that the CRs they use were, originally, developed using the formulae in the game. And then those formulae ended up being wrong. [I]A lot[/I]. Instead of correcting the formulae, they [I]ad hoc[/I] modified individual CRs of monsters that got enough playtesting to make a better guess at how strong they were. This is a big part of why CR is borderline useless, and why many experienced 5e DMs explicitly advice folks to just "wing it" or the like--because it generally won't make any difference, and may in fact [I]improve[/I] encounter design because your intuitions are likely better than weak, often-faulty formulae. This is part of why I found it so frustrating and baffling when Mearls said things like "math is easy, feel is hard" (paraphrased but he [I]did[/I] explicitly say that "math is easy.") It's not easy! That's literally why we pay mathematicians and statisticians to do it! I would agree that that is the biggest challenge for someone [I]who desires to be[/I] a DM, and is a novice. The biggest challenge for someone who [I]does not[/I] desire to be a DM, regardless of whether they are a novice or an expert or anywhere in-between, is obviously that they do not desire to do it. Which is the problem I'm actually dealing with. I know maybe two or three people who have even the tiniest degree of willingness to DM, at all, ever, at any point in their natural lives. One is already running full games (and of a system I would prefer not to use if at all possible); the second is unable to play TTRPGs in general right now due to life issues; and the third wanted to, but I guess the game fell through, as I had been coaching them and then it just sort of petered out without further commentary. If the issue is not "I'm scared of doing it" but rather "I really, really just do not want to do that thing," then no amount of coaching, of minimizing commitment level, of lowering the barriers, of zero-pressure encouragement, will ever get them from not being a DM to being a DM. ETA: Also, I am [I]genuinely[/I] impressed at how stable the distribution in the votes has been. Like, this is a pattern that's been going since there were maybe 20 voters. Four times as many voters, and the pattern remains almost completely unchanged. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
5e Players: How often have you been allowed to use 3PP?
Top