Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ath'kethin" data-source="post: 7710400" data-attributes="member: 6798775">I'm happy about this version because if things keep going like this, it will save me another $50.00 that I otherwise would have spent on a book.I don't hate it, but the whole psionics-is-magic thing has rubbed me the wrong way since it became the norm in 3e. I do like the more warlock-y structure to this version, as opposed to a more wizard-y take, but it's still not different enough from what we already have to be called "different" in my book.  I don't need psionics in my campaign. An approach to the concept similar to the way 2nd edition did it might get me onboard,and it looked briefly like they might be heading more in that direction, but the more they pull away from it the less interest I have.</blockquote>