Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Viktyr Gehrig" data-source="post: 5936078" data-attributes="member: 9249">I like the idea that non-humans get +2 to two scores and humans get +1 to six scores and some sort of preference in level-based ability boosts.So yeah, each race is a little bit better at some classes and a little bit worse at others. What are the humans best at?Multiclassing.Not only do they have the broad-based stats to back it up, but they should get a racial feature that actually makes multiclassing easier-- a la HARP-- and something that makes them a little bit better at any class, like the extra at-will power in 4e.Yes, do not want. Instead of having sub-races like AD&D and 3.X I would rather have customizable races like Pathfinder's Advanced Player's Guide and upcoming Advanced Race Guide with a dash of 4e's flexible racial bonuses.Hmm. I think it's time for me to go back to my Pathfinder Lab.If you've got a system where all abilities improve, like 4e, +1 is a meaningful bonus over the career of the character-- it's only a 50/50 chance at any given level. Ignoring things like feat prerequisites and the auto-success DC threshold.Wasn't really possible in 4e because multiclassing didn't exist... but I'd really like Humans to be superior multiclassers.</blockquote>