Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Azzy" data-source="post: 8530402" data-attributes="member: 6563">Then I can't really help you there.And, yet, since stats were determined by 3d6 and no modifiers, the average remains the same even if you trunicate the minimum.You can't call half the D&amp;D like for most of the game's history an outlier and expect to be taken seriously.See, that's a problem that would be corrected by no ASIs. Let's not push any race to be any specific class.Talk about an outlier.Assuming you feel forced to create the most optimized character and not just, you know, play what you want. Or a dwarf, or an elf (if you have an 13+ INT, again assuming you care).Or dwarves. And thankfully, the game is moving on from prescribing certain roles for certain races. That blows.I think better still, we should think about what facilitates more fun. Racial ASIs are just the last vestige of pushing players to play a certain after AS minimums/maximums, class limits, level limits, etc.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Azzy, post: 8530402, member: 6563"] Then I can't really help you there. And, yet, since stats were determined by 3d6 and no modifiers, the average remains the same even if you trunicate the minimum. You can't call half the D&D like for most of the game's history an outlier and expect to be taken seriously. See, that's a problem that would be corrected by no ASIs. Let's not push any race to be any specific class. Talk about an outlier. Assuming you feel forced to create the most optimized character and not just, you know, play what you want. Or a dwarf, or an elf (if you have an 13+ INT, again assuming you care). Or dwarves. And thankfully, the game is moving on from prescribing certain roles for certain races. That blows. I think better still, we should think about what facilitates more fun. Racial ASIs are just the last vestige of pushing players to play a certain after AS minimums/maximums, class limits, level limits, etc. [/QUOTE]

Verification