Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tyrian_Spellstealer" data-source="post: 2853824" data-attributes="member: 36470">That thread is a discussion thread. It is my understanding that the vote proposed in this thread in reguards to the setting restrictions was NEVER carried out, due to WotC throwing us out on the lawn (which is wizards loss) - instead when we found the new forums and chat site over at UH the 'setting restriction proposal' was already decided on by the powers that be, not by a community vote.There WAS a vote on the setting to replace Juxta, but that (at the time) had nothing to do with setting restrictions. It was Faerun that won the vote, but again when the move to UH was made the powers that be decided to include Sigil as well, something i'm quite thankful for personally.If my understanding in this is wrong (something that happens frequently <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )and we were given a vote on the setting restrictions, I would indeed LOVE to see where the vote and its results are hidden - i've been searching for such a thread for some time but have yet to find it.One of course could argue that we were given a chance to object in the discussion thread, but theres a big difference between 'voting' on an issue and discussing it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tyrian_Spellstealer, post: 2853824, member: 36470"] That thread is a discussion thread. It is my understanding that the vote proposed in this thread in reguards to the setting restrictions was NEVER carried out, due to WotC throwing us out on the lawn (which is wizards loss) - instead when we found the new forums and chat site over at UH the 'setting restriction proposal' was already decided on by the powers that be, not by a community vote. There WAS a vote on the setting to replace Juxta, but that (at the time) had nothing to do with setting restrictions. It was Faerun that won the vote, but again when the move to UH was made the powers that be decided to include Sigil as well, something i'm quite thankful for personally. If my understanding in this is wrong (something that happens frequently :) )and we were given a vote on the setting restrictions, I would indeed LOVE to see where the vote and its results are hidden - i've been searching for such a thread for some time but have yet to find it. One of course could argue that we were given a chance to object in the discussion thread, but theres a big difference between 'voting' on an issue and discussing it. [/QUOTE]

Verification