Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5914508" data-attributes="member: 2067">I don't really see this as a semantic battle, but as a gameplay one: folks want a class that can run out of spells. Now, I think it makes probably the most sense for the wizard to be that class, given the history of the game and Vancian magic and and the likely players and such, but that point is largely orthogonal to the point of having a class that does not have at-will magic.I don't know why anyone would be particularly attached to the word "wizard" for an at-will spellcaster, given that only 4e wizards really HAVE that option (and EVERY spellcaster -- every character! -- in 4e has that option, and no option to be otherwise), but whatever.</blockquote>