A sad day for DC Comics based movies!

Viking Bastard said:
Do not mock the Guy. The Guy rulez all your arzez.

finally someone understands the power of the guy.
The guy rulez all.

I actually think he's a really cool character who's remarkably unique in having a hero character with a different political mindset. The only downside is when they tried to make him comic relief or the character to be mocked. Probably because of that different political mindset. And it sucks that they had him retire even though he now has the valdarian warriar genes that give him a genetic imperative to protect, riiiight. Sure cancel the comic if it isn't doing well enough, but retire what a lame writing decision.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I guess I'm one of the only people who doesn't like Jack Black. He's just not very funny to me. I honestly love Jim Carrey and Robin Williams. Am I missing something here? :confused:

Somewhat off topic, but have you ever noticed how many comic book characters have to do with green? Green Lantern, Green Goblin, Green Hornet.... Wow, I have way too much time on my hands if I actually ponder these things. :\
 

buzzard said:
WB has owned DC for decades now. I'm not even sure when they first bought them.
DC was originally bought by the media corporation Kinney National Services in
1967. Some years later Kinney changed it's name to Warner Communications
after buying the WB studios. Warner Communications later merged with Time
Magazine and then AOL.

So, basically, it's pretty much a case of a shared parent company.
 

Enchantress said:
I guess I'm one of the only people who doesn't like Jack Black. He's just not very funny to me. I honestly love Jim Carrey and Robin Williams. Am I missing something here? :confused:
See School of Rock or if you have the LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring Extended Edition find the easter egg on the first part movie DVD.
 

Hey all, go to the DC Comics offical boards and read what they have to say this and the non-Catwoman movie. For GL, have all say the same things that we are saying. Thhey all think it is a bad and stupid idea on what WB is doing.
 

Klaus said:
Hey, I'm still not keen on Keaton as Batman, either! :)
I dunno. Of all the four Batman films made so far, I find Michael Keaton to be the best portrayal of Bruce Wayne and Batman. Val does not impress me. Clooney does not impress me.

But Christian Bale might.
 
Last edited:

Ranger REG said:
I dunno. Of all the four Batman films made so far, I find Michael Keaton to be the best portrayal of Bruce Wayne and Batman. Val does not impress me. Clooney does not impress me.

But Christian Bale might.

slight hijack but I agree. I liked Keaton as Batman. Val Kilmer was ok, but with Keaton you sort of got the vague impression that Bruce Wayne disturbed underneath it all. And Christian Bale does disturbed well.

Sometimes casting against type works well.
 
Last edited:

My problem with Keaton wasn't the way he played the part. That was just fine.

It's just that Keaton didn't have the physicality to be Batman. Yes, Bats is dark and disturbed and brooding and the world's best detective.

He's also one of the world's best martial artists and acrobats, and he could whup up on any 12 normal people without breaking a sweat.

Keaton--and, to be fair, the huge rubber suit that didn't allow him to move--couldn't convey that.

Christan Bale can. (Witness the movie Equilibrium.)
 

I liked Keaton as Batman. I mean, whenever he was Batman, it was his stunt double (for anything acrobatic). I didn't like the choreography in the first movie, but that's just a personal preference. I thought that Keaton did a good job of showing the darkness inherent in Bruce Wayne -- or at least that incarnation of him. He didn't look like a superhero, but that was, I thought, intentional -- underscoring the dichotomy of pampered playboy/ruthless vigilante.

As for the Jack Black news... I'd love to see him in a more serious role -- not completely downer, just serious -- to see if he could handle it. I'd love to see both the joy and excitement and some of the anger and rage that Black can get across sometimes.

But it sounds like they're aiming for "less Spider-man 2, more Bruce Almighty", which is great, except that I didn't think Bruce Almighty did very well.

(By "like Bruce Almighty", I mean that he's going to spend a lot of time doing stupid green-energy tricks. He'll goose women with it. He'll make green Nike shoes that let him fly and beat the local bully in a slam-dunk competition. He'll make a green expensive car (some brand name) and impress the local girl by showing up in it. And then he'll realize that the ring doesn't bring complete happiness, and he'll be sad, and he'll want to throw it away, and then Sinestro will show up for five minutes at the end, played by Morgan Freeman, and Black will whack him with a big green mallet, kiss the girl, and pull down a big green curtain to end the movie.)
 

It looks like was a rumor!

The Jack Black-Green Lanter rumor was refuted at the DC Comics panel today at the San Diego Con by Dan Didio and Geoff Johns.

Wonder Woman writer Greg Rucka said a new version of Wonder Woman screenplay is being drafted by a solid but unnamed screenwriter.

this was over at the DC Comics boards.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top