mroberon1972
First Post
I was asking a question in the art forums, when something I was told there gave me an idea:
For small publishers, the startup cost of purchasing art can be too high to be possible at first, what about a combination of the percentage payment, up to an amount reasonably higher than that of a flat payment?
Example:
If a normal B&W art unit would cost $15 up front, then offer to pay 50% to 100% more, but in payments based on 20% of the profits until paid off.
This prevents the problem of tracking the artist for royalties even years after the fact. Also, the artist gets his income faster then a normal percentage, and also makes more in the final total than he would if he took a flat fee.
Any thoughts?
Mr. Oberon
For small publishers, the startup cost of purchasing art can be too high to be possible at first, what about a combination of the percentage payment, up to an amount reasonably higher than that of a flat payment?
Example:
If a normal B&W art unit would cost $15 up front, then offer to pay 50% to 100% more, but in payments based on 20% of the profits until paid off.
This prevents the problem of tracking the artist for royalties even years after the fact. Also, the artist gets his income faster then a normal percentage, and also makes more in the final total than he would if he took a flat fee.
Any thoughts?
Mr. Oberon