Certainly we spend more time discussing not-D&D than we do rules.No option for talking about everything but the game?
That has been my experience. Sometimes it seemed like more than playing the game.Certainly we spend more time discussing not-D&D than we do rules.
It's true. In hindsight, I would have configured the diagram to use circles of different sizes, along with a subset that shows those options either overlapping, not overlapping, or overlapping completely.(Math Nerd moment: Properly speaking, B, C, and D are all equivalent in terms of Venn diagrams, which simply show which relations between sets exist, not the relative "sizes" of those relations: A says the union of blue and red is empty, E says their disjunctive union is empty, B/C/D all say neither of those is empty. I'm not aware of any diagram that shows the relative sizes of sets, though, so it's not a bad shorthand, as long as it's clear what you mean by it.)
Since somebody else brought it up. Yes to the above, plus A and E technically would not be Venn diagrams, since Venn Diagrams have to show every possible combination, but leave it empty if such a combination does not actually exist. Those could be less-famous but very useful Euler diagrams.(Math Nerd moment: Properly speaking, B, C, and D are all equivalent in terms of Venn diagrams, which simply show which relations between sets exist, not the relative "sizes" of those relations: A says the union of blue and red is empty, E says their disjunctive union is empty, B/C/D all say neither of those is empty. I'm not aware of any diagram that shows the relative sizes of sets, though, so it's not a bad shorthand, as long as it's clear what you mean by it.)