A well-meaning thread that degenerated into "is the OA Samuari historically accurate"

[Felon]

Can't speak for anyone else, but when I see a well considered mechanical element see an alternate version that is rather trite by way of comparison, that
1) stands out as me as a sign that the company is headed in the wrong direction and dashes my hopes of ever seen the earlier and IMO better version seing proper treatment under this edition
2) makes it so I am swimming upstream when trying to convince players with the "latest and greatest" mentality which version will/should be used.

On this particular subject, you do indeed speak for me as well. Seems to me that "critique and discussion" are what we usually do when a new book comes out.

 

[Gez]

Having not seen the book, and not being psychic actually , no I didn't knew that they chose a dwarf for samurai.

But it makes sense.

 

[Celtavian]

re

I apologize as well gfunk. It was not my original intent to start a Samurai debate. I just stated my opinion on the CW version of the core class: that it was not well-researched from a historical or fictional standpoint.

I can't help but rebut an attack upon me. It is my nature. Once again, my apologies.