A "Why Oh Why" RPG Thread [+]


log in or register to remove this ad



But that doesn't really answer the question, though. Plenty of humanoids lack protective shells, scales, etc., too...but oh heavens no, they aren't allowed to cover up with metal for protection. But if they're lacking claws and fangs, metal is acceptable?

It's just so weird and arbitrary; I feel like it should be all-or-nothing. For my part, I'd prefer druids who won't use metal of any kind, not even coins for currency...they fight with spears and bows, their armor is made from chitin and hides, they trade in pearls and pelts, etc. Much more evocative. If you're going to put in a restriction "for flavor," commit to it. :)
Huh

I don't see the metal restriction mentioned anywhere in the latest UA Druid playtest packet
 


There was a question about Vancian magic systems earlier in the threads, and I found this bit on ENworld that might be relevant:

Specifically:
The Dungeons & Dragons wizard is actually inspired by the wizards of Jack Vance's Dying Earth series. Gygax explained the four cardinal types of magic in literature: those systems which require long conjuration with much paraphernalia as visualized by Shakespeare in Macbeth and Robert E. Howard in Conan, those which require short spoken spells (like Jack Vance's Dying Earth series), ultra-powerful magic typical of DeCamp and Pratt in the "Harold Shea" stories, and "generally weak and relatively ineffectual magic (as found in J.R.R. Tolkien's work)." Taking into account the need for speed and balance, Gygax chose the most expedient form of spell casting, Vancian magic.

So basically: Elizabethan was too slow, DeCamp/Pratt was too powerful, and Tolkien was too weak. Vancian was (1) fast and (2) intermediate in terms of power.
 

Oh great. One more thing I'll have to "fix" later, if I decide to switch to the new system. ;)
Your druid PC goes on a journey of self-exploration and spends 100 days in the deepest forest reading ancient Druidic scripts, and then comes out of the forest and tells the other PCs, "I've been reading it wrong the whole time! It says 'no medals', not 'no metals'"?
 

Your druid PC goes on a journey of self-exploration and spends 100 days in the deepest forest reading ancient Druidic scripts, and then comes out of the forest and tells the other PCs, "I've been reading it wrong the whole time! It says 'no medals', not 'no metals'"?
I'd prefer that druids didn't use either. :-)
 

I'd prefer that druids didn't use either. :)
OK, your druid PC goes on a journey of self-exploration and spends 100 days in the deepest... blah blah blah ...comes out of the forest and tells the other PCs, "That new druid sect is saying it's fine to use metals, pfffff, with those modern ways, out of touch with nature, they'll never get past the Initiate rank'"?
 


Remove ads

Top