Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bow_Seat" data-source="post: 5996241" data-attributes="member: 6698793">I for one think it's a necessary change since rogues would be 6xMAD if they had to actually have the stats to be good at their multitude of skills. And since the dev team has set up the rogue to be the &quot;best at skills&quot; he needs to be damn good with his skills.Also, things like sneak, which is on of the rogues trademarks, requires a check even round when moving and scouting ahead. It's hard enough that he has to make it to cover each turn just to try and hide in the first place (not that this is unreasonable, form a logic standpoint). Also, if you are really being a stickler, then he needs to find a way to stay hidden during his entire movement if you look at the RAW for stealth. If the rogue had a serious (&gt;10%) chance of failure on any one stealth check, having the rogue scout ahead would be suicide based just upon the idea that he would surely fail at least one roll on average and be spotted out by the monsters.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bow_Seat, post: 5996241, member: 6698793"] I for one think it's a necessary change since rogues would be 6xMAD if they had to actually have the stats to be good at their multitude of skills. And since the dev team has set up the rogue to be the "best at skills" he needs to be damn good with his skills. Also, things like sneak, which is on of the rogues trademarks, requires a check even round when moving and scouting ahead. It's hard enough that he has to make it to cover each turn just to try and hide in the first place (not that this is unreasonable, form a logic standpoint). Also, if you are really being a stickler, then he needs to find a way to stay hidden during his entire movement if you look at the RAW for stealth. If the rogue had a serious (>10%) chance of failure on any one stealth check, having the rogue scout ahead would be suicide based just upon the idea that he would surely fail at least one roll on average and be spotted out by the monsters. [/QUOTE]

Verification