Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6325582" data-attributes="member: 22779">But the game has not had no non-magical healing since OD&amp;D.&nbsp; AD&amp;D had non-magical healing.&nbsp; 2e had non-magical healing.&nbsp; 3e has non-magical healing.&nbsp; 4e has non-magical healing.&nbsp; EVERY EDITION SINCE OD&amp;D has had non-magical healing.&nbsp; Why are you insisting that they specifically support a play style that has never been supported?&nbsp; They are making you happy.&nbsp; The Wp/Vp system specifically covers EXACTLY what you claim to want.&nbsp; Every single part of your criticism has been covered by a Wp/Vp system.&nbsp; What do you think a Wp/Vp system is?&nbsp;&nbsp; If you insist on absolutely no non-magical healing, and you refuse to house rule, the only edition that actually supports what you want is OD&amp;D.&nbsp; That's it.&nbsp; Every single edition has non-magical healing, IN CORE.&nbsp; I think that's why you are seeing such frustration from the other side of the fence.&nbsp; What you are asking for has never actually appeared in D&amp;D but you are then claiming that it will &quot;easily cost them a million dollars in sales&quot;.&nbsp; You are asking us to believe that a play style, that has never actually been supported in D&amp;D, is so common that it will cost significant amounts of sales if the very, very specific solution (to a problem that has already been resolved, albeit in a different manner) isn't included.Do you not see how unreasonable these claims are?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6325582, member: 22779"] But the game has not had no non-magical healing since OD&D. AD&D had non-magical healing. 2e had non-magical healing. 3e has non-magical healing. 4e has non-magical healing. EVERY EDITION SINCE OD&D has had non-magical healing. Why are you insisting that they specifically support a play style that has never been supported? They are making you happy. The Wp/Vp system specifically covers EXACTLY what you claim to want. Every single part of your criticism has been covered by a Wp/Vp system. What do you think a Wp/Vp system is? If you insist on absolutely no non-magical healing, and you refuse to house rule, the only edition that actually supports what you want is OD&D. That's it. Every single edition has non-magical healing, IN CORE. I think that's why you are seeing such frustration from the other side of the fence. What you are asking for has never actually appeared in D&D but you are then claiming that it will "easily cost them a million dollars in sales". You are asking us to believe that a play style, that has never actually been supported in D&D, is so common that it will cost significant amounts of sales if the very, very specific solution (to a problem that has already been resolved, albeit in a different manner) isn't included. Do you not see how unreasonable these claims are? [/QUOTE]

Verification