Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4897919" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>[quoite]'automatic hit' is not a defined game term.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Actually, 'automatic hit' and 'you hit automatically' are, in fact, language pulled directly from the PHB rules that govern the general situation you automatically hit in, when you roll a natural 20. The game book disagrees that 'automatic hit' is not in the game, because it uses the term.</p><p></p><p>So yes, it -is- perfectly legitimate game terminology.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And how did tier 1 tech support explain this, exactly?</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry, but I find this entire thing to be addlecoved. I do not understand how Precision could not possibly apply. I do not possibly comprehend how the ability blows it off without it saying or refering to blowing it off in any way. I do not understand how 'you score a critical hit' does not get 'some abilities allow you to score a critical hit' applied to it.</p><p></p><p>It's -exactly- like saying that ongoing damage from two abilities stack because it doesn't say 'The target -can- take ongoing damage' or because specific powers trump <strong>the very rules that tell you how to use that effect that is the exception in the first place.</strong></p><p></p><p>So, -unless the feature says it is an automatic hit- then it is governed by the rules that tell you how to adjudicate when you score a critical hit. Those rules don't say 'If it tells you you score a critical hit, you automaticly hit, but if it only mentions the possibility, blah.' Not at all. They say, flat out 'Some abilities allow you to break the critical hit rules, and when they do, only a natural 20 is an automatic hit.' </p><p></p><p>The rule Precision is a rule governing specific exceptions to the critical rule. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>is the rub of this.</p><p></p><p>So what does the path feature contradict? The rule about rolling 20s to crit? Yes. It does. So we use the specific rule.</p><p></p><p>But does it contradict Precision? Can precision be applied to this path feature without a contradiction? </p><p></p><p>The answer is yes, because Precision specifically calls out rules-violations of this type and says 'And this is how you get to work.'</p><p></p><p>The truly dumbfounding thing, is that Precision is -verbatim- about abilities that allow you to -score critical hits.-</p><p></p><p>So saying 'You score a critical hit' is how you get around precision is like saying the Fire keyword in Fireball means you don't get to add bonus damage from Astral Fire.</p><p></p><p>It. Doesn't. Make. Sense.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4897919, member: 71571"] [quoite]'automatic hit' is not a defined game term.[/quote] Actually, 'automatic hit' and 'you hit automatically' are, in fact, language pulled directly from the PHB rules that govern the general situation you automatically hit in, when you roll a natural 20. The game book disagrees that 'automatic hit' is not in the game, because it uses the term. So yes, it -is- perfectly legitimate game terminology. And how did tier 1 tech support explain this, exactly? I'm sorry, but I find this entire thing to be addlecoved. I do not understand how Precision could not possibly apply. I do not possibly comprehend how the ability blows it off without it saying or refering to blowing it off in any way. I do not understand how 'you score a critical hit' does not get 'some abilities allow you to score a critical hit' applied to it. It's -exactly- like saying that ongoing damage from two abilities stack because it doesn't say 'The target -can- take ongoing damage' or because specific powers trump [B]the very rules that tell you how to use that effect that is the exception in the first place.[/B] So, -unless the feature says it is an automatic hit- then it is governed by the rules that tell you how to adjudicate when you score a critical hit. Those rules don't say 'If it tells you you score a critical hit, you automaticly hit, but if it only mentions the possibility, blah.' Not at all. They say, flat out 'Some abilities allow you to break the critical hit rules, and when they do, only a natural 20 is an automatic hit.' The rule Precision is a rule governing specific exceptions to the critical rule. is the rub of this. So what does the path feature contradict? The rule about rolling 20s to crit? Yes. It does. So we use the specific rule. But does it contradict Precision? Can precision be applied to this path feature without a contradiction? The answer is yes, because Precision specifically calls out rules-violations of this type and says 'And this is how you get to work.' The truly dumbfounding thing, is that Precision is -verbatim- about abilities that allow you to -score critical hits.- So saying 'You score a critical hit' is how you get around precision is like saying the Fire keyword in Fireball means you don't get to add bonus damage from Astral Fire. It. Doesn't. Make. Sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top