Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4898030" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>Here's the rub. We are not talking about daggermaster. Daggermaster is not relevant to the conversation. Whether it says 'can' or not is irrelevant to the conversation. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And then Precision explicitly states (with no ifs, butts or maybes) that scoring a critical hit does not mean an automatic hit with 20s.</p><p></p><p>What Holy Ardor does NOT do is state that critical hits from it actually automaticly hit. In the -absense- of an explicit exception, apply the original rule.</p><p></p><p>This is the -exact- same argument form you present:</p><p></p><p>'Fireball says you deal 3d6+Intellegence modifier damage. No, you can't reduce that damage with resistance, or immunity! You do that much damage, no more, and no less. Outside rules cannot modify it, because the power does not explicitly allow for modification from outside rules. It is specific, and therefore trumps general. It doesn't say you -can- deal that much damage! It says, flat out, that creature takes that damage. No, it doesn't matter that the rules for how damage works tells you you can do it. Specific beats general.'</p><p></p><p>That argument form is thusly defeated, proof by contradiction.</p><p></p><p>Precision's language doesn't -care- if the ability is 'optional' about the critical hits. It says, without ambiguity, that features that allow non-20 critical hits do not automatically hit. Which means that the onus to prove that it doesn't goes back to the original ability to show that it -explicitly- gets to break the rule on how to govern 'scoring a critical hit.'</p><p></p><p>All you've established is that Holy Ardor scores a critical hit. No one is arguing that, that IS unambiguous. Now, you need to establish that it gets to break the rules on how abilities that allow you to score a critical hit work. This what you haven't done, just like the above Fireball argument hasn't actually established how Fireball breaks the rules on how damage work.</p><p></p><p>And it can't do so, because it -doesn't- break those rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4898030, member: 71571"] Here's the rub. We are not talking about daggermaster. Daggermaster is not relevant to the conversation. Whether it says 'can' or not is irrelevant to the conversation. And then Precision explicitly states (with no ifs, butts or maybes) that scoring a critical hit does not mean an automatic hit with 20s. What Holy Ardor does NOT do is state that critical hits from it actually automaticly hit. In the -absense- of an explicit exception, apply the original rule. This is the -exact- same argument form you present: 'Fireball says you deal 3d6+Intellegence modifier damage. No, you can't reduce that damage with resistance, or immunity! You do that much damage, no more, and no less. Outside rules cannot modify it, because the power does not explicitly allow for modification from outside rules. It is specific, and therefore trumps general. It doesn't say you -can- deal that much damage! It says, flat out, that creature takes that damage. No, it doesn't matter that the rules for how damage works tells you you can do it. Specific beats general.' That argument form is thusly defeated, proof by contradiction. Precision's language doesn't -care- if the ability is 'optional' about the critical hits. It says, without ambiguity, that features that allow non-20 critical hits do not automatically hit. Which means that the onus to prove that it doesn't goes back to the original ability to show that it -explicitly- gets to break the rule on how to govern 'scoring a critical hit.' All you've established is that Holy Ardor scores a critical hit. No one is arguing that, that IS unambiguous. Now, you need to establish that it gets to break the rules on how abilities that allow you to score a critical hit work. This what you haven't done, just like the above Fireball argument hasn't actually established how Fireball breaks the rules on how damage work. And it can't do so, because it -doesn't- break those rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top