Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N8Ball" data-source="post: 4909108" data-attributes="member: 63757"><p>And I have shown the term "critical hit" to be encompased by "hit" through examples and direct quotes from the book. (and it makes sense)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I explained, "automatic hit" is a sometimes-coincident <strong>result</strong> with critical hit, and NEVER a criteria for it. Looking for that wording is would be the basis for the faulty causation argument mentioned. But we agree that is not there, we know that there are crits that are not automatic hits and automatic hits that are not crits. </p><p></p><p>Obviously "Automatic hit" has never been a requirement for a crit just as it is not even a requirement for a hit. The two may be coincident, but that is simple correlation due to similar requirements. They are not at all dependent on each other.</p><p></p><p>But the criteria for achieving a crit <strong>are modified </strong>by feats and features. The end result of satisfying those new or modified criteria is also a critical hit.</p><p></p><p>If a power or feature said you simply hit, then you would hit regardless of the normal requirements and restrictions on hitting. And what's more, you'd hit even if you didn't have the word "automatic" in front of it, because although the "Hit:" section has requirements on hitting (just like critting), it also defines what a hit is (just like critting) and so a "hit" could be applied no matter what you rolled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N8Ball, post: 4909108, member: 63757"] And I have shown the term "critical hit" to be encompased by "hit" through examples and direct quotes from the book. (and it makes sense) As I explained, "automatic hit" is a sometimes-coincident [B]result[/B] with critical hit, and NEVER a criteria for it. Looking for that wording is would be the basis for the faulty causation argument mentioned. But we agree that is not there, we know that there are crits that are not automatic hits and automatic hits that are not crits. Obviously "Automatic hit" has never been a requirement for a crit just as it is not even a requirement for a hit. The two may be coincident, but that is simple correlation due to similar requirements. They are not at all dependent on each other. But the criteria for achieving a crit [B]are modified [/B]by feats and features. The end result of satisfying those new or modified criteria is also a critical hit. If a power or feature said you simply hit, then you would hit regardless of the normal requirements and restrictions on hitting. And what's more, you'd hit even if you didn't have the word "automatic" in front of it, because although the "Hit:" section has requirements on hitting (just like critting), it also defines what a hit is (just like critting) and so a "hit" could be applied no matter what you rolled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top