Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N8Ball" data-source="post: 4910445" data-attributes="member: 63757"><p>Excellent post. Here is my evidence:</p><p><strong>Critical hit is a subset of hit,</strong> Supported by the following:</p><p>-> Critical Hit is an entry indented under hit.</p><p>-> The basic requirements for a crit include hitting <strong>before</strong> you get there, not after. I.E. crit is the destination, not an intermediate step.</p><p></p><p>-> The descriptions of critical hit in 3 places</p><p>--> High crit, </p><p>--> Valanae example on 276</p><p>--> The critical hit entry under hits, first it says that you might crit and then it says what happends if you DO.</p><p></p><p>Each of these 3 parts talks about achieving a crit and offer no more requirements, they just describe an effect. The hit is assumed in every instance.</p><p></p><p>I appreciate you putting 'automatic' in quotes. It makes your statement much clearer. </p><p></p><p>It does beg the question what you mean by "automatic" because "automatic" isn't really defined either. It's just amplifying and provides no explicit requirements or implications.</p><p></p><p>We agree that rolling a 20 lets you "automatically" succeed on a attack roll.</p><p></p><p>Following that form and use of the word "automatically",</p><p>A lets you "automatically" succeed on an attack roll.</p><p></p><p>You could just as easily replace A with B and the statement would still be true according to the rules, where B is "have an attack roll high enough to hit". So A is not the only way to "automatically" hit. (NOTE: We're not talking about "automatic hit" rules, we're simply using "automatic" as an adjective (or adverb).)</p><p></p><p>Yes, I know it's a tautology, but the point is that "automatically" doesn't come with any mechanical weight. </p><p></p><p>In the case of Holy Ardor, (using the logical terms defined on page 8)</p><p>(D and not E) gives you X</p><p>since X is a subset of H</p><p>(D and not E) logically achieve H</p><p></p><p>The seams in my argument are if you can show elements of X that fall outside H, but if you acknowledge permissive language in the crit abilities, that becomes a pretty tight seam.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N8Ball, post: 4910445, member: 63757"] Excellent post. Here is my evidence: [B]Critical hit is a subset of hit,[/B] Supported by the following: -> Critical Hit is an entry indented under hit. -> The basic requirements for a crit include hitting [B]before[/B] you get there, not after. I.E. crit is the destination, not an intermediate step. -> The descriptions of critical hit in 3 places --> High crit, --> Valanae example on 276 --> The critical hit entry under hits, first it says that you might crit and then it says what happends if you DO. Each of these 3 parts talks about achieving a crit and offer no more requirements, they just describe an effect. The hit is assumed in every instance. I appreciate you putting 'automatic' in quotes. It makes your statement much clearer. It does beg the question what you mean by "automatic" because "automatic" isn't really defined either. It's just amplifying and provides no explicit requirements or implications. We agree that rolling a 20 lets you "automatically" succeed on a attack roll. Following that form and use of the word "automatically", A lets you "automatically" succeed on an attack roll. You could just as easily replace A with B and the statement would still be true according to the rules, where B is "have an attack roll high enough to hit". So A is not the only way to "automatically" hit. (NOTE: We're not talking about "automatic hit" rules, we're simply using "automatic" as an adjective (or adverb).) Yes, I know it's a tautology, but the point is that "automatically" doesn't come with any mechanical weight. In the case of Holy Ardor, (using the logical terms defined on page 8) (D and not E) gives you X since X is a subset of H (D and not E) logically achieve H The seams in my argument are if you can show elements of X that fall outside H, but if you acknowledge permissive language in the crit abilities, that becomes a pretty tight seam. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top