Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 4921381" data-attributes="member: 111"><p>I am so glad you posted this, for this is your key mistake.</p><p></p><p>The rules say if you do A, you score a critical hit if you also do B.</p><p></p><p>Another rule comes along and says Whenever you do C, you score a critical hit if you also do D.</p><p></p><p>That other rule just changed what you need to score a critical hit - it creates an exception to the previous rule by specifying a new rule. </p><p></p><p>This is what you do not see - or least is that with which do you do not agree.</p><p></p><p>Actual words from the rules (the parallel is truly amazing):</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Yellow">If</span> you roll a 20 on the die when making an attack roll, <span style="color: Red">you score a critical hit</span> <span style="color: yellow">if </span>your total attack roll is high enough to hit your target’s defense.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Yellow">Whenever</span> you make two attack rolls because of your oath of enmity, <span style="color: Red">you score a critical hit </span><span style="color: Yellow">if</span> both dice have the same roll, except if both rolls are 1.</p><p></p><p>It more than strains credibility to think they'd write up the new rule in a way so parallel to the old rule if they did not intend it to replace the old rule in the way that the plain text reads.</p><p></p><p>As for Precision, it simply says nothing new. It says that some features/powers might change the number you roll, and that only a 20 will be an automatic hit - as in a automatic hit if the roll is not a critical hit</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 4921381, member: 111"] I am so glad you posted this, for this is your key mistake. The rules say if you do A, you score a critical hit if you also do B. Another rule comes along and says Whenever you do C, you score a critical hit if you also do D. That other rule just changed what you need to score a critical hit - it creates an exception to the previous rule by specifying a new rule. This is what you do not see - or least is that with which do you do not agree. Actual words from the rules (the parallel is truly amazing): [COLOR="Yellow"]If[/COLOR] you roll a 20 on the die when making an attack roll, [COLOR="Red"]you score a critical hit[/COLOR] [COLOR="yellow"]if [/COLOR]your total attack roll is high enough to hit your target’s defense. [COLOR="Yellow"]Whenever[/COLOR] you make two attack rolls because of your oath of enmity, [COLOR="Red"]you score a critical hit [/COLOR][COLOR="Yellow"]if[/COLOR] both dice have the same roll, except if both rolls are 1. It more than strains credibility to think they'd write up the new rule in a way so parallel to the old rule if they did not intend it to replace the old rule in the way that the plain text reads. As for Precision, it simply says nothing new. It says that some features/powers might change the number you roll, and that only a 20 will be an automatic hit - as in a automatic hit if the roll is not a critical hit [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top