Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CovertOps" data-source="post: 4921912" data-attributes="member: 65152"><p>I guess maybe I missed the mark on the question I asked. What I am trying to get at is how would you word the critical hit rules such that they apply to ALL critical hits without having to mention specific exceptional mechanics such as a critical being granted by Holy Ardor on doubles AND any other new mechanic WotC might come up with over the course of the game.</p><p></p><p>Our position has pretty much been that the critical hit rules apply to ALL critical hits and that either you got a natural 20 (one path) or you got any other result that allows a critical (Precision). Either way the "Hit" rules (Precision) still apply (mostly just a reminder).</p><p></p><p>So my question again is how would you want Precision reworded so it simply applies to ANY critical where you rolled something other than 20 <strong>without mentioning specific mechanics of how you got the critical</strong>? A general rule that does what it is supposed to do...cover all cases by being generic enough in it's wording where you need some really specific wording to circumvent it.</p><p></p><p>Or alternatively some reasoning why you think doubles <strong>IS</strong> different enough (without granting itself a specific exemption) to warrant being immune to Precision.</p><p></p><p>I'd be willing to hear from you N8Ball on this too. I am genuine in my interest about what you think makes doubles so special that Precision does <strong>not</strong> apply (considering that OoE - the ability that allows you to roll the two dice - gives a method to resolve the two rolls into a single roll which could then qualify for Precision).</p><p></p><p>Edit: Keeping in mind that my position is that this is all resolved by following the ordered rules for making an attack on p269 and that permissive language just simply doesn't matter ("can" - Dagger Master IMO could be worded "you score a critical" and would be no different than it is now, or if it was worded this way would you argue that Precision doesn't apply to it either based on the lack of the permissive?). I'm more interested in how you think Precision would need to be reworded, but if you prefer to do the other what I'd like to know is why doubles is so different than rolling say 18-19 for Dagger Master when both grant you a critical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CovertOps, post: 4921912, member: 65152"] I guess maybe I missed the mark on the question I asked. What I am trying to get at is how would you word the critical hit rules such that they apply to ALL critical hits without having to mention specific exceptional mechanics such as a critical being granted by Holy Ardor on doubles AND any other new mechanic WotC might come up with over the course of the game. Our position has pretty much been that the critical hit rules apply to ALL critical hits and that either you got a natural 20 (one path) or you got any other result that allows a critical (Precision). Either way the "Hit" rules (Precision) still apply (mostly just a reminder). So my question again is how would you want Precision reworded so it simply applies to ANY critical where you rolled something other than 20 [b]without mentioning specific mechanics of how you got the critical[/b]? A general rule that does what it is supposed to do...cover all cases by being generic enough in it's wording where you need some really specific wording to circumvent it. Or alternatively some reasoning why you think doubles [b]IS[/b] different enough (without granting itself a specific exemption) to warrant being immune to Precision. I'd be willing to hear from you N8Ball on this too. I am genuine in my interest about what you think makes doubles so special that Precision does [b]not[/b] apply (considering that OoE - the ability that allows you to roll the two dice - gives a method to resolve the two rolls into a single roll which could then qualify for Precision). Edit: Keeping in mind that my position is that this is all resolved by following the ordered rules for making an attack on p269 and that permissive language just simply doesn't matter ("can" - Dagger Master IMO could be worded "you score a critical" and would be no different than it is now, or if it was worded this way would you argue that Precision doesn't apply to it either based on the lack of the permissive?). I'm more interested in how you think Precision would need to be reworded, but if you prefer to do the other what I'd like to know is why doubles is so different than rolling say 18-19 for Dagger Master when both grant you a critical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adent Champion. Rules lawyers required
Top