reapersaurus
Explorer
Very impressive, stand-up behavior, by posting that message to the internet, PA.
However, as a computer professional, I feel I should give some feedback about some of the computer-specific stuff that happened.
a) [knee-jerk response] A virus? Come on, that's the oldest excuse in the book. Everybody says it, even though most viruses are quite easy to buffer against. What virus was it exactly? Why weren't the computers protected with anti-virus software? Why didn't the filters catch it, unless you want us to believe it was a brand-new virus that Symantec didn't know about, and you were the first on the internet to get hit with it. [/kneejerk]
b) Network congestion:
Networks are awfully fast now - it's hard for a virus to take them down, unless they're specifically designed to do so (SQL SLammer virus, for example). Did they have a Gigabit network, or just a 100 MB network? If you're expecting high traffic volume, it's not much more expensive to go with a GB network, since you're installing it from scratch, I'd wager.
c) The printers probably could be buffered from anetwork congestion simply by making them local printers, instead of dealing with network traffic.
I don't know if that's feasible with the order-processing software you're using, but I see no technical reason why there wasn't one print-out station that could have generated local print jobs.
That's all off the top of my head.
Did you have a network engineer worth their salt design this network, or did they take the 'plug this end here, then this end here' approach?
It's not 1998 anymore - computers are not new, and the difficulties you described are not unexpected, or difficult to guard against.
Take any feedback at face value, since I can't tell you I've installed a PointOfSale network, but networks are pretty standardized now.
However, as a computer professional, I feel I should give some feedback about some of the computer-specific stuff that happened.
a) [knee-jerk response] A virus? Come on, that's the oldest excuse in the book. Everybody says it, even though most viruses are quite easy to buffer against. What virus was it exactly? Why weren't the computers protected with anti-virus software? Why didn't the filters catch it, unless you want us to believe it was a brand-new virus that Symantec didn't know about, and you were the first on the internet to get hit with it. [/kneejerk]
b) Network congestion:
Networks are awfully fast now - it's hard for a virus to take them down, unless they're specifically designed to do so (SQL SLammer virus, for example). Did they have a Gigabit network, or just a 100 MB network? If you're expecting high traffic volume, it's not much more expensive to go with a GB network, since you're installing it from scratch, I'd wager.
c) The printers probably could be buffered from anetwork congestion simply by making them local printers, instead of dealing with network traffic.
I don't know if that's feasible with the order-processing software you're using, but I see no technical reason why there wasn't one print-out station that could have generated local print jobs.
That's all off the top of my head.
Did you have a network engineer worth their salt design this network, or did they take the 'plug this end here, then this end here' approach?
It's not 1998 anymore - computers are not new, and the difficulties you described are not unexpected, or difficult to guard against.
Take any feedback at face value, since I can't tell you I've installed a PointOfSale network, but networks are pretty standardized now.