Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Antithetist" data-source="post: 5125278" data-attributes="member: 88443">[sblock=OOC]Doh indeed. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  But no matter, if the Owlbear does happen to drop this turn then I don't think one unmarked Kenku will lose us the fight or anything. I'll bear that in mind for future turns though. r1 has indeed been very forbearing about our OOC chatter so far. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I've taken that as a signal that it's ok, since I don't really know what the protocols are around these parts, and after all 4E does seem to rely on (or at least invite) a pretty high level of tactical coordination compared to previous editions. But hopefully you'd tell us if we were getting out of line, right r1?  Fair point about my last attack, it's just conceivable that the Owlbear has a truly crappy will defense. If that's the case then the damage roll was made at the same time as the attack, it was <a href="http://www.hwx.it/wizards.com/dice.php?sid=3936#128797" target="_blank">1d8+7=14</a> and would also have granted 3 temp hp to Unit 16.[/sblock]</blockquote>

Verification