Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Skywalker" data-source="post: 9198403" data-attributes="member: 1538">The last minute change to 5e means that I am out as a backer as well. My concern is less about 5e, which is an OK system, and more that they have rushed to develop the system in 6 months which is not sufficient time to do much more than a poor reskin job on the 5e system. More would be needed to implement 5e to AT properly. It is also annoying that this will likely push the Yes and system back by at least 2 years and for no other reason than to rush out a quick last minute 5e version.It does take inspiration for D&amp;D, D&amp;D is not just 5e and the edition isn't the greatest for the kind of D&amp;D that AT taps into. An OSR style AT RPG could be stellar. Case in point:[ATTACH=full]331672[/ATTACH]The issue is that the Yes and system was ready to go to KS a few months back. It will now be pushed back for 2 years or so whilst they rush out a quick 5e version.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Skywalker, post: 9198403, member: 1538"] The last minute change to 5e means that I am out as a backer as well. My concern is less about 5e, which is an OK system, and more that they have rushed to develop the system in 6 months which is not sufficient time to do much more than a poor reskin job on the 5e system. More would be needed to implement 5e to AT properly. It is also annoying that this will likely push the Yes and system back by at least 2 years and for no other reason than to rush out a quick last minute 5e version. It does take inspiration for D&D, D&D is not just 5e and the edition isn't the greatest for the kind of D&D that AT taps into. An OSR style AT RPG could be stellar. Case in point: [ATTACH type="full" width="289px"]331672[/ATTACH] The issue is that the Yes and system was ready to go to KS a few months back. It will now be pushed back for 2 years or so whilst they rush out a quick 5e version. [/QUOTE]

Verification