Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trancejeremy" data-source="post: 5772339" data-attributes="member: 924">As much as I loved the d20/OGL era, I think in retrospect the whole thing was a mistake from WOTC's point of view, as well as their "rulebooks sell, adventures don't" policy.I mean, I own probably 300 d20 books. Out of that, maybe 15 were from WOTC. Sure, some of it was money I simply wouldn't have spent, but some of it likely would have gone towards WOTC stuff.I also think it spreads the community too much. I mean, virtually everyone played the Isle of Dread or Castle Amber or Tomb of Horrors. I can't even remember any of the 3e adventures from WOTC (Sunless Grotto?)They just need to make the adventures more appealing, and have a higher profit margin (in other words, no more 32 page or less ones). And they don't necessarily have to please everyone with every product - I think WOTC was too risk adverse during 3e. It's possible for them to have a line of adventure path style adventure, as well as more free-form, site based ones.</blockquote>